Cited by 2Digital literacy in educationEducation and Technology IntegrationEducation and Digital Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pre-service teachers’ competence to teach science through information and communication technologies in South Africa

Open access
Jita, Thuthukile·2016·Perspectives in Education

Abstract

Research suggests that there is a need for better training of prospective teachers on information and communication technologies (ICTs) in order to encourage their use for teaching and learning in schools. This paper presents findings on the self-perceptions of competence by pre-service teachers to use ICTs for teaching science content. A mixed method approach was used where 103 final year pre-service teachers completed a questionnaire on their competence to use ICTs for teaching and 21 of them participated in focus group interviews concerning their experiences with ICTs during teaching practice. Results show that pre-service teachers seem to be more competent in the non-technology related skills compared to the technology related knowledge fields and that there are significant variations in their ICT competences. These variations largely result from the uneven opportunities to learn that are provided to the pre-service teachers. More significantly, the directional trend shown by the correlations indicates that the more lecturers or mentor teachers use ICT tools to teach, the more pre-service teachers learn to use ICT tools in their own teaching. The paper concludes with a discussion on the implication of these findings for policy and practice and specifically suggests that there is a need to review the policy guidelines on the development of the teacher education programmes to be more deliberate in their inclusion of ICTs. The key recommended contribution is for teacher preparation programmes at universities to be restructured in order to improve the training of future teachers on the use of ICTs to teach science.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.38140/pie.v34i3.1965

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jita, T.
Affiliations
University of the Free State (ZA)
Corresponding author
Jita, Thuthukile
Venue
Perspectives in Education
Published
2016-09-30
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
15-28
ISSN
  • 0258-2236 (ISSN-L)
  • 2519-593X
OpenAlex
W7147660984
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Perspectives in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Digital Technologies
Keywords
pre-service teachers, ICT competence, science education, information and communication technologies, perceived competence, teacher professional development, teaching practice, cooperating teachers, teacher education curriculum, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review