Introduction
Abstract
According to the secularization thesis, religious faith should have long ago disappeared, overwhelmed by the forces of progress. Yet while explicit membership in denominational communities is certainly less an obligatory feature of contemporary culture than it was a generation or two ago, modes of religion still play important roles in aspects of social life. This issue of Telos explores some of the ramifications of this afterlife of faith.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reflexivity is a key feature of qualitative research.
“Reflexivity is a key feature of qualitative research.”
From Adults researching with children (2023) · cites this paper as Berman, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adults researching with children
Berman, R., & MacNevin, M. (2023) · doi:10.32920/21909258
Self-citation
- Authors
- Berman, R. A.
- Corresponding author
- Berman, R. A.
- ORCID
- Berman, R. A.
- Venue
- Telos
- Publisher
- Telos Press
- Published
- 2014-03-01
- Volume
- 2014
- Issue
- 166
- Pages
- 3-8
- ISSN
- 0090-6514 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-459X
- OpenAlex
- W4229927201
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Telos (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- secularization theory, faith, contemporary religion, religious communities, religious decline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
