Extending Prescribing Privileges in Canada
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The level of reimbursement for patient-centered services offered in community pharmacists in Canada varies greatly across provinces, in part because the 10 provincial regulatory bodies have different legislative and professional standards.
“The level of reimbursement for patient-centered services offered in community pharmacists in Canada varies greatly across provinces, in part because the 10 provincial regulatory bodies have different legislative and professional standards [13,34].”
From From “retailers” to health care providers: Transforming the role of community pharmacists in chronic disease management (2015) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Sketris, I.
- Corresponding author
- Sketris, Ingrid
- ORCID
- Sketris, Ingrid
- Venue
- Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-19
- ISSN
- 0828-6914 (ISSN-L)
- 1715-1635
- 1913-701X
- OpenAlex
- W1998214002
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
- Keywords
- prescribing privileges, pharmacist prescribing, scope of practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
