Cited by 107Pharmacy and Medical PracticesNursing Roles and PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Independent Pharmacist Prescribing in Canada

Open access
Law, Michael R., Ma, Tracey, Fisher, Judith, Sketris, Ingrid S.·2012·Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada

Abstract

Background: While pharmacists are trained in the selection and management of prescription medicines, traditionally their role in prescribing has been limited. In the past 5 years, many provinces have expanded the pharmacy scope of practice. However, there has been no previous systematic investigation and comparison of these policies. Methods: We performed a comprehensive policy review and comparison of pharmacist prescribing policies in Canadian provinces in August 2010. Our review focused on documents, regulations and interviews with officials from the relevant government and professional bodies. We focused on policies that allowed community pharmacists to independently continue, adapt (modify) and initiate prescriptions. Results: Pharmacists could independently prescribe in 7 of 10 provinces, including continuing existing prescriptions (7 provinces), adapting existing prescriptions (4 provinces) and initiating new prescriptions (3 provinces). However, there was significant heterogeneity between provinces in the rules governing each function. Conclusions: The legislated ability of pharmacists to independently prescribe in a community setting has substantially increased in Canada over the past 5 years and looks poised to expand further in the near future. Moving forward, these programs must be evaluated and compared on issues such as patient outcomes and safety, professional development, human resources and reimbursement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3821/1913-701x-145.1.17

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Law, M. R., Ma, T., Fisher, J., & Sketris, I. S.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Law, Michael R.
  • Ma, Tracey
  • Fisher, Judith
  • Sketris, Ingrid S.
Venue
Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada
Published
2012-01
Volume
145
Issue
1
Pages
17-23.e1
ISSN
  • 0828-6914 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-1635
  • 1913-701X
OpenAlex
W2008877447
Cited by
107
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alberta College of Pharmacy
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
community pharmacists, scope of practice, pharmacy regulation, medication changes, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review