The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory
Abstract
As with so much of Western culture, the contemporary idea of planning is rooted in the enlightenment tradition of 'modernity'. This modern idea of planning, as J. Friedmann has described in his authoritative account of its intellectual origins, is centrally linked to concepts of democracy and progress. Environmental planning, it was argued, put the needs of capital before citizens and the environment. Environmental planning has been understood as a process for collectively, and interactively, addressing and working out how to act, in respect of shared concerns about how far and how to 'manage' environmental change. The outlines of appropriate practices for an inter-communicative planning are beginning to emerge through the work of a range of planning theorists during the 1980s. J. Habermas offers the theory of communicative action as an inter-subjective project of emancipation from fundamentalism, totalitarianism and nihilism through deliberate efforts in mutual understanding through argument.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument
Fisher, W. R. (1984) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637758409390180 · Cited by 1,807
Cited by
Moral Obligations, Planning, and the Public Interest: A Commentary on Current British Practice
Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2000) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b2509 · Cited by 104
Urban Gardening and Green Space Governance: Towards New Collaborative Planning Practices
Nikolaidou, S., Klöti, T., Tappert, S., & Drilling, M. (2016) · Urban Planning · doi:10.17645/up.v1i1.520 · Cited by 73
Unpacking social learning in planning: who learns what from whom?
von Schönfeld, K. C., Tan, W., Wiekens, C., & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2020) · Urban Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/17535069.2019.1576216 · Cited by 47
Pedagogy, Podcasts, and Politics: What Role Does Podcasting Have in Planning Education?
Moore, T. (2024) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x221106327 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Healey, P.
- Venue
- Town Planning Review
- Publisher
- Liverpool University Press
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143
- ISSN
- 0041-0020 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-341X
- OpenAlex
- W1792611288
- Cited by
- 1,095
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
- The paper
- Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.