The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Software for Genome‐Wide Association Studies in Autopolyploids and Its Application to Potato
Open accessAbstract
Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) are widely used in diploid species to study complex traits in diversity and breeding populations, but GWAS software tailored to autopolyploids is lacking. The objectives of this research were to (i) develop an R package for autopolyploids based on the Q + K mixed model, (ii) validate the software with simulated data, and (iii) analyze a diversity panel of tetraploid potatoes. A unique feature of the R package, called GWASpoly, is its ability to model different types of polyploid gene action, including additive, simplex dominant, and duplex dominant. Using a simulated tetraploid population, we confirmed our hypothesis that statistical power is higher when the assumed gene action in the GWAS model matches the gene action at unobserved quantitative trait loci (QTL). Thirteen traits were analyzed in the Solanaceae Coordinated Agricultural Project (SolCAP) potato diversity panel and, consistent with previous studies, significant QTL for tuber shape and eye depth co‐localized on chromosome 10. For the other traits, only marginally significant QTL were detected, most likely due to insufficient statistical power: for simulated traits with a heritability ( h 2 ) of 0.3, the median genome‐wide power was only 0.01. Our results indicate that both marker density and population size were limiting factors for GWAS with the SolCAP panel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples
Bradbury, P. J., Zhang, Z., Kroon, D. E., Casstevens, T. M., Ramdoss, Y., & Buckler, E. S. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308 · Cited by 7,759
Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions
VanRaden, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980 · Cited by 6,050
ROGERS, S. M., & BERNATCHEZ, L. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02396.x · Cited by 5,088
Jombart, T., Devillard, S., & Balloux, F. (2010) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-11-94 · Cited by 4,963
Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping.
Churchill, G. A., & Doerge, R. W. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/138.3.963 · Cited by 4,935
Calamita, E., Schmid, M., Kunz, M., Ndebele-Murisa, M. R., Magadza, C. H. D., Nyambe, I., & Wehrli, B. (2019) · Figshare · doi:10.26181/6153922fe919c · Cited by 4,222
Cited by
Genome-Assisted Prediction of Quantitative Traits Using the R Package sommer
Covarrubias-Pazaran, G. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156744 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosyara, U. R., De Jong, W. S., Douches, D. S., & Endelman, J. B.
- Venue
- The Plant Genome
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1940-3372 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2412574955
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software for Genome‐Wide Association Studies in Autopolyploids and Its Application to Potato. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3835/plantgenome2015.08.0073
- The paper
- Rosyara, U. R., De Jong, W. S., Douches, D. S., & Endelman, J. B. (2016). Software for Genome‐Wide Association Studies in Autopolyploids and Its Application to Potato. The Plant Genome. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2015.08.0073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.