Cited by 68Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFungal Plant Pathogen Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antifungal Activity of Essential Oils from Some Medicinal Plants of Iran against Alternaria alternate

Open access
Hadizadeh·2009·American Journal of Applied Sciences

Abstract

Problem statement: Increasing public concern over the level of pesticide residues in food especially fresh produce has built up adequate pressure for scientists to look for less hazardous and environmentally safer compounds for controlling post harvest diseases.Essential oils as registered food grade materials have the potential to be applied as alternative anti-fungal treatments for fresh fruits and vegetables.Approach: We present in this study, the identification of the essential oils with antifungal activity from some medicinal plants of Iran (nettle (Urtica dioica L.), thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.), Rue (Ruta graveolens L.) and common yarrow (Achillea millefolium L.)), and their potential application as "generally regarded as safe" antifungal compounds against Alternaria alternate on tomato as a model pathosystem.Results: Both the nettle and the thyme oils exhibited antifungal activity against A. alternata.The thyme oil exhibited a lower degree of inhibition 68.5 and 74.8% at 1500 and 2000 ppm, respectively.Spore germination and germ tube elongation of the pathogens in potato dextrose broth was strongly reduced in the presence of 1500 ppm of the nettle oil.The same concentration of this oil reduced the percentage of decayed tomatoes.The experiments on reducing the development of natural tomato rot gave similar results.Conclusions: Application of essential oils for postharvest disease control of fresh produce, as a novel emerging alternative to hazardous anti-fungal treatments will allow a safer and environmentally more acceptable management of postharvest diseases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3844/ajassp.2009.857.861

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hadizadeh
Corresponding author
Hadizadeh
Venue
American Journal of Applied Sciences
Published
2009-05-01
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
857-861
ISSN
1546-9239 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134214034
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
American Journal of Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
essential oils, antifungal activity, Alternaria alternata, tomato, postharvest disease, Urtica dioica, thyme, Eucalyptus, Ruta graveolens, yarrow, spore germination inhibition, germ tube elongation, pesticide residues, medicinal plants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review