The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A NEW ADDITIVE RATIO ASSESSMENT (ARAS) METHOD IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION‐MAKING / NAUJAS ADITYVINIS KRITERIJŲ SANTYKIŲ ĮVERTINIMO METODAS (ARAS) DAUGIAKRITERINIAMS UŽDAVINIAMS SPRĘSTI
Open accessAbstract
Multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) methods are used in many areas of human activities. Each alternative in a multicriteria decision‐making problem can be described by a set of criteria. Criteria can be qualitative and quantitative. They usually have different units of measurement and a different optimization direction. The normalization aims at obtaining comparable scales of criteria values. The paper introduces a new Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) method. In order to illustrate the described ARAS method a real case study of evaluation of microclimate in office rooms is presented. The case study aims to determine the inside climate of the premises, where people work, and to define measures to be taken to improve their environment. Based on the analysis, the following criteria for inside climate evaluation are suggested: air turnover inside the premises, air humidity, air temperature, illumination intensity, air flow rate, and dew point. The criteria weights were determined by the method of pairwise comparison based on the estimates of experts. Santrauka Daugiakriteriniai sprendimų metodai taikomi daugelyje žmogaus veiklos sričių. Kiekviena alternatyva, sprendžiant daugiakriterinius uždavinius, gali būti apibūdinta kriteriju aibe. Kriterijai gali būti kokybiniai ir kiekybiniai. Jie paprastai turi skirtingus matavimo vienetus ir įvairią optimizavimo kryptį. Kriterijų vertės yra normalizuojamos lyginamos skalės vertėms gauti. Straipsnyje pateikiamas naujas adityvinis kriterijų santykių įvertinimo metodas (ARAS) daugiakriteriniams uždaviniams spręsti. ARAS metodo taikymui pavaizduoti pateiktas realus mikroklimato biuro patalpose vertinimo tyrimas. Tyrimo tikslas ‐ įvertinti patalpų, kurioje žmonės dirba, mikroklimata ir nustatyti priemones, kurių reikia imtis aplinkai pagerinti. Remiantis uždavinio tikslų analize, siūlomi šie kriterijai vidaus klimatui įvertinti: oro pasikeitimas, patalpų oro santykinė dregmė, oro temperatūra, apšvietimo intensyvumas, oro srautas ir rasos taškas. Kriterijų svoriai nustatomi porinio lyginimo metodu, remiantis ekspertų vertinimais. Kriterijų reikšmės nustatytos sertifikuotu prietaisu.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Attribute Decision Making
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981) · Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 · Cited by 8,526
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
Tsoukias, A., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1994) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2584151 · Cited by 8,370
Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1 · Cited by 4,988
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys
Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrogott, M. (2005) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/b100605 · Cited by 4,491
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Carlsson, C. (1983) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1983.216 · Cited by 2,459
Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding
Roy, B. (1996) · Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1 · Cited by 1,350
Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding
French, S. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1038/sj.jors.2600981 · Cited by 1,280
Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N. A., & Dublish, S. (1998) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00147-1 · Cited by 1,026
The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy
Brauers, W. K., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006) · Control and Cybernetics · Cited by 968
Self-citationTentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method
Guitouni, A., & Martel, J.-M. (1998) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00073-3 · Cited by 880
Cited by
Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2011) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/20294913.2011.593291 · Cited by 837
Self-citationRETRACTED: Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2017) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-17184 · Cited by 142
Self-citationRetractedÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME PROBLEMLERİNDE ARAS YÖNTEMİ
Yıldırım, B. F. (2015) · Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.18025/kauiibf.65151 · Cited by 59
(2011) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · Cited by 24
Optimization of PFMEA Team Composition in the Automotive Industry Using the IPF-RADAR Approach
Komatina, N., & Marinković, D. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18060342 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z.
- Venue
- Technological and Economic Development of Economy
- Published
- 2010-06-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-172
- ISSN
- 1392-8619 (ISSN-L)
- 2029-4913
- 2029-4921
- OpenAlex
- W2015343144
- Cited by
- 961
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 26.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A NEW ADDITIVE RATIO ASSESSMENT (ARAS) METHOD IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION‐MAKING / NAUJAS ADITYVINIS KRITERIJŲ SANTYKIŲ ĮVERTINIMO METODAS (ARAS) DAUGIAKRITERINIAMS UŽDAVINIAMS SPRĘSTI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3846/tede.2010.10
- The paper
- Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). A NEW ADDITIVE RATIO ASSESSMENT (ARAS) METHOD IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION‐MAKING / NAUJAS ADITYVINIS KRITERIJŲ SANTYKIŲ ĮVERTINIMO METODAS (ARAS) DAUGIAKRITERINIAMS UŽDAVINIAMS SPRĘSTI. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.