Temporary Capture of Asteroids by a Planet: Dependence of Prograde/retrograde Capture on Asteroids' Semimajor Axes
Open accessAbstract
We have investigated the dependence of the prograde/retrograde temporary capture of asteroids by a planet on their original heliocentric semimajor axes through analytical arguments and numerical orbital integrations in order to discuss the origins of irregular satellites of giant planets. We found that capture is mostly retrograde for the asteroids near the planetary orbit and is prograde for those from farther orbits. An analytical investigation reveals the intrinsic dynamics of these dependences and gives boundary semimajor axes for the change in prograde/retrograde capture. The numerical calculations support the idea of deriving analytical formulae and confirm their dependence. Our numerical results show that the capture probability is much higher for bodies from the inner region than for outer ones. These results imply that retrograde irregular satellites of Jupiter are most likely captured bodies from the nearby orbits of Jupiter that may have the same origin as Trojan asteroids, while prograde irregular satellites originate from far inner regions such as the main-belt asteroid region.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retrograde orbits are generally the result of captured small objects, like many of the Solar System's retrograde moons.
“However, this raises more questions on the origin of such a ring since retrograde orbits are generally the result of captured small objects, like many of the Solar System's retrograde moons (Nesvorný et al., 2014;Higuchi and Ida 2016;Namouni and Morais 2018).”
From A Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation (2022) · cites this paper as Higuchi and Ida 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation
Sutton, P. J., Albery, B., & Muff, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2022.819933 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“However, this raises more questions on the origin of such a ring since retrograde orbits are generally the result of captured small objects, like many of the Solar System’s retrograde moons (Nesvorný et al., 2014; Higuchi and Ida 2016; Namouni and Morais 2018).”
Background
- Authors
- Higuchi, A., & Ida, S.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2292239308
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- LPI
- Funders
- National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23740335)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- temporary capture, asteroids, semi-major axis, irregular satellites, Jupiter, Trojan asteroids, main-belt asteroid, capture probability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review