Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE EVOLUTION OF THE GALAXY STELLAR MASS FUNCTION AT z = 4–8: A STEEPENING LOW-MASS-END SLOPE WITH INCREASING REDSHIFT

Open access
Song, Mimi, Finkelstein, Steven L., Ashby, Matthew L. N., Grazian, A., Lu, Yu, Papovich, Casey, Salmon, Brett, Somerville, Rachel S., Dickinson, Mark, Duncan, K., Faber, Sandy M., Fazio, Giovanni G., Ferguson, Henry C., Fontana, Adriano, Guo, Yicheng, Hathi, Nimish, Lee, Seong-Kook, Merlin, Emiliano, Willner, S. P.·2016·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present galaxy stellar mass functions (GSMFs) at z = 4–8 from a rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) selected sample of ∼4500 galaxies, found via photometric redshifts over an area of ∼280 arcmin 2 in the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS)/Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) fields and the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. The deepest Spitzer/IRAC data to date and the relatively large volume allow us to place a better constraint at both the low- and high-mass ends of the GSMFs compared to previous space-based studies from pre-CANDELS observations. Supplemented by a stacking analysis, we find a linear correlation between the rest-frame UV absolute magnitude at 1500 Å ( ) and logarithmic stellar mass ( ) that holds for galaxies with . We use simulations to validate our method of measuring the slope of the –M UV relation, finding that the bias is minimized with a hybrid technique combining photometry of individual bright galaxies with stacked photometry for faint galaxies. The resultant measured slopes do not significantly evolve over z = 4–8, while the normalization of the trend exhibits a weak evolution toward lower masses at higher redshift. We combine the –M UV distribution with observed rest-frame UV luminosity functions at each redshift to derive the GSMFs, finding that the low-mass-end slope becomes steeper with increasing redshift from at z = 4 to at z = 8. The inferred stellar mass density, when integrated over –10 13 M ⊙, increases by a factor of between z = 7 and z = 4 and is in good agreement with the time integral of the cosmic star formation rate density.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/5

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Song, M., Finkelstein, S. L., Ashby, M. L. N., Grazian, A., Lu, Y., Papovich, C., Salmon, B., Somerville, R. S., Dickinson, M., Duncan, K., Faber, S. M., Fazio, G. G., Ferguson, H. C., Fontana, A., Guo, Y., Hathi, N., Lee, S.-K., Merlin, E., & Willner, S. P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2016-06-24
Volume
825
Issue
1
Pages
5
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W3102670554
Cited by
328
References
82
FWCI
16.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EVOLUTION OF THE GALAXY STELLAR MASS FUNCTION AT z = 4–8: A STEEPENING LOW-MASS-END SLOPE WITH INCREASING REDSHIFT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/5
The paper
Song, M., Finkelstein, S. L., Ashby, M. L. N., Grazian, A., Lu, Y., Papovich, C., Salmon, B., Somerville, R. S., Dickinson, M., Duncan, K., Faber, S. M., Fazio, G. G., Ferguson, H. C., Fontana, A., Guo, Y., Hathi, N., Lee, S.-K., Merlin, E., & Willner, S. P. (2016). THE EVOLUTION OF THE GALAXY STELLAR MASS FUNCTION AT z = 4–8: A STEEPENING LOW-MASS-END SLOPE WITH INCREASING REDSHIFT. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.