Gap Opening in 3D: Single-Planet Gaps
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Giant planets can clear deep gaps when embedded in 2D (razor-thin) viscous circumstellar disks. We show by direct simulation that giant planets are just as capable of carving out gaps in 3D. Surface density maps are similar between 2D and 3D, even in detail. In particular, the scaling of gap surface density with planet mass, derived from a global “zero-dimensional” balance of Lindblad and viscous torques, applies equally well to results obtained at higher dimensions. Our 3D simulations reveal extensive, near-sonic, meridional flows both inside and outside the gaps; these large-scale circulations might bear on disk compositional gradients, in dust or other chemical species. At high planet mass, gap edges are mildly Rayleigh unstable and intermittently shed streams of material into the gap—less so in 3D than in 2D.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Protoplanets in a circumstellar disk show a similar gap width relationship with their mass.
“Although more complicated, protoplanets in a circumstellar disk show a similar gap width relationship with their mass.”
From A Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation (2022) · cites this paper as Fung and Chiang 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Situ formation of Icy Moons of Uranus and Neptune
Szulágyi, J., Cilibrasi, M., & Mayer, L. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaeed6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
A Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation
Sutton, P. J., Albery, B., & Muff, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2022.819933 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“It is also dependent on disk properties (Duffell and MacFadyen 2013; Fung and Chiang 2016; Kanagawa et al., 2016) but further strengthens the hypothesis of the mass being the key driver in gap width.”
Background
- Authors
- Fung, J., & Chiang, E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fung, Jeffrey
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-11-21
- Volume
- 832
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2411409117
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1411954)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX13AI57G)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- circumplanetary disks, three-dimensional fluid dynamics, viscous disk evolution, Lindblad torque, viscous torque, meridional flow, Rayleigh instability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review