Cited by 16Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Satellite Systems and Control

Chaotic dynamics of trans-Neptunian objects perturbed by planet nine

Open access
Hadden, Sam, Li, Gongjie, Payne, Matthew J., Holman, Matthew J.·2018·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

Observations of clustering among the orbits of the most distant trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) has inspired interest in the possibility of an undiscovered ninth planet lurking in the outskirts of the solar system. Numerical simulations by a number of authors have demonstrated that, with appropriate choices of planet mass and orbit, such a planet can maintain clustering in the orbital elements of the population of distant TNOs, similar to the observed sample. However, many aspects of the rich underlying dynamical processes induced by such a distant eccentric perturber have not been fully explored. We report the results of our investigation of the dynamics of coplanar test-particles that interact with a massive body on an circular orbit (Neptune) and a massive body on a more distant, highly eccentric orbit (the putative Planet Nine). We find that a detailed examination of our idealized simulations affords tremendous insight into the rich test-particle dynamics that are possible. In particular, we find that chaos and resonance overlap plays an important role in particles’ dynamical evolution. We develop a simple mapping model that allows us to understand, in detail, the web of overlapped mean-motion resonances explored by chaotically evolving particles. We also demonstrate that gravitational interactions with Neptune can have profound effects on the orbital evolution of particles. Our results serve as a starting point for a better understanding of the dynamical behavior observed in more complicated simulations that can be used to constrain the mass and orbit of Planet Nine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-3881/aab88c

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even long-term stable KBOs do not remain bound to a single mean motion commensurability on Gyr timescales.

    “implying that even long-term stable KBOs do not remain bound to a single mean motion commensurability on Gyr timescales (which is also seen in Becker et al. 2017; Hadden et al. 2018).”

    From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Hadden et al. 2018

  • Mean-motion resonances with Planet Nine are relevant to the dynamical evolution of the distant Kuiper belt.

    “Are mean-motion resonances (MMRs) with Planet Nine relevant to the dynamical evolution of the distant Kuiper belt? Strictly speaking, the answer is yes (Millholland and Laughlin, 2017; Becker et al., 2017; Hadden et al., 2018; Bailey et al., 2018)”

    From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Hadden et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The planet nine hypothesis

    Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., Brown, M. E., & Becker, J. C. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009 · Cited by 181 · see citing works

    “Drawing on previously published results (Brown and Batygin 2016; Hadden et al. 2018; Cáceres & Gomes 2018 and the references therein), simulations in which Planet Nine’s perihelion distance was smaller than q9 6 100 AU or greater than q9 > 500 AU were immediately discarded.”
    BackgroundResultInfluential
  • Generation of Low-inclination, Neptune-crossing Trans-Neptunian Objects by Planet Nine

    Batygin, K., Morbidelli, A., Brown, M. E., & Nesvorný, D. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad3cd2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works

    “To construct the inter-Neptunian perihelion distribution, we followed previous studies (e.g., Li et al. 2018; Batygin et al. 2019; Hadden et al. 2018; Becker et al. 2018; Batygin et al. 2019; Brown & Batygin 2021 and references therein) and examined the orbital footprints generated by particles…”
    BackgroundMethod

Authors
Hadden, S., Li, G., Payne, M. J., & Holman, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Hadden, Sam
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2018-05-24
Volume
155
Issue
6
Pages
249
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2775923908
Cited by
16
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
Planet Nine, trans-Neptunian objects, orbital clustering, chaotic dynamics, mean motion resonance, overlapping resonances, test particle dynamics, mapping model, orbital evolution, undiscovered planet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review