Calculation of the Uncertainties in the Planetary Precessions with the Recent EPM2017 Ephemerides and their Use in Fundamental Physics and Beyond
Open accessAbstract
I tentatively compile the formal uncertainties in the secular rates of change of the orbital elements a, e, I, Ω, and ϖ of the planets of the solar system from the recently released formal errors in a and the nonsingular elements h, k, p, and q estimated for the same bodies with the EPM2017 ephemerides by E. V. Pitjeva and N. P. Pitjev. The highest accuracies occur for the inner planets and Saturn in view of the extensive use of radiotechnical data collected over the last decades. For the inclination I, node Ω and perihelion ϖ of Mercury and Mars, I obtain accuracies , while for Saturn they are . As far as the semimajor axis a is concerned, its rates for the inner planets are accurate to the level, while for Saturn I obtain . In terms of the parameterized post-Newtonian (PPN) parameters β and γ, a formal error as little as for the Hermean apsidal rate corresponds to a ≃2 × 10−7 bias in the combination parameterizing the Schwarzschild-type periehlion precession of Mercury. The realistic uncertainties of the planetary precessions may be up to one order of magnitude larger. I discuss their potential multiple uses in fundamental physics, astronomy, and planetology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No secular variations Δκ different from zero at a statistically significant level have been determined to date.
“Since no secular variations ∆ κ that are different from zero at a statistically significant level have been determined to date, it is possible to write |∆ κ| ≤ σ κ”
From Has Kronos Devoured Planet Nine and Its Epigones? (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System
Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22 · Cited by 432 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Last but not least, the location of the recently hypothesized new, remote planet of the solar system (Batygin & Brown 2016; Brown & Batygin 2016), provisionally known as Planet Nine or Telisto, can be effectively constrained by means of the orbital precessions of the other known major bodies of the…”
BackgroundObservational constraints on the orbit and location of Planet Nine in the outer solar system
Brown, M. E., & Batygin, K. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/l23 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Has Kronos Devoured Planet Nine and Its Epigones?
Iorio, L. (2026) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe12020042
“From the definition of Θ µν and using equation (2), we have In other words, Θ µν will depend on the Lagrangian of matter, that is, this can refer to the case of the electromagnetic field, the massless scalar field, the case of the perfect fluid, among others.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Iorio, L.
- Affiliations
- Ministry of Education, Universities and Research (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Iorio, Lorenzo
- ORCID
- Iorio, Lorenzo
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2019-05-07
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 220
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2949891762
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2023-01-31)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- planetary precession, mercury, Mars, Saturn, apsidal precession, inner planets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review