Post-new-horizons Orbits and Masses for the Satellites of Pluto
Open accessAbstract
We report on ephemerides for the satellites of Pluto based on the large set of astrometric measurements. Our orbit fit yielded the following masses with 1 σ uncertainties: GM Pluto = 869.3 ± 0.4 km 3 s −2 , GM Charon = 106.1 ± 0.3 km 3 s −2 , GM Nix = 1.50 ± 0.52 × 10 −3 km 3 s −2 , GM Hydra = 2.01 ± 0.27 × 10 −3 km 3 s −2 , corresponding to the densities of ρ Pluto = 1.853 ± 0.004 g cm −3 , ρ Charon = 1.705 ± 0.006 g cm −3 , ρ Nix = 0.88 ± 0.31 g cm −3 , and ρ Hydra = 1.21 ± 0.19 g cm −3 . Masses of Kerberos and Styx remain unconstrained, and it is unlikely that we will be able to measure them even if we obtain abundant 1 mas precision astrometry during the next 20 yr. We summarize the results of orbit integration in terms of osculating and precessing ellipse model mean elements. All satellites reside in near-circular orbits, and Kerberos and Styx have 0.4 deg and 0.3 deg inclinations with respect to Charon’s orbit plane. The nodal regression periods for Kerberos and Hydra are ∼9 and ∼14 yr respectively. We found that Charon’s orbit pole can be approximated as: R.A. = 133.0073 + 0.0036 T deg, and decl. = –6.2449 + 2.5 × 10 −5 T deg, where T is Julian centuries from the epoch J2000, based on 5000 yr of orbit integration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Brozović, M., & Jacobson, R. A.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brozović, Marina
- Jacobson, Robert A.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2024-05-08
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 256
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W4396724981
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Keywords
- Pluto satellites, Charon, Nix, Hydra, Kerberos, Styx, satellite mass, orbit integration, orbital inclination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review