The Orbits of Uranus, Its Satellites and Rings, the Gravity Field of the Uranian System, and the Orientation of the Poles of Uranus and Its Satellites*
Open accessAbstract
R. A. Jacobson determined the orbits of the Uranian satellites, the masses of Uranus and its satellites, and the orientation of the pole of Uranus from Earth-based astrometry, Earth-based ring occultations, and observations acquired with the Voyager 2 spacecraft. Subsequent to that publication, several observers obtained new astrometry, and some of the original astrometry was rereduced against the Gaia star catalog. Moreover, R. G. French et al. made a new determination of the orbits of the Uranian rings, the orientation of the Uranian pole, and the gravity harmonics of Uranus from the entire set of Uranian ring occultations. Here we report the results of an analysis that redetermined the Uranus and satellite masses, satellite orbits, and the orbit of Uranus. In addition, we obtained a value for the Uranus tidal dissipation factor and produced an independent determination of the Uranian ring orbits, Uranus pole direction, and Uranus gravity harmonics. We also developed new expressions for the orientations of the satellites. We processed all of the data from our previous work plus the new and rereduced astrometry and the ring occultations. We extended our data arc forward to 2016 and backward to 1847. Our new orbit for Uranus is an update of that in ephemeris DE440 incorporating the occultation data and Gaia astrometry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If conservatively rescaled by a factor of ten, σr ≲ 320 km, in substantial agreement with the latest evaluations of Uranus's orbit uncertainty obtained by reducing astrometry data against the Gaia star catalogue.
“If conservatively rescaled by a factor of ten, it yields σ r ≲ 320 km, in substantial agreement with the latest evaluations of the Uranus' orbit uncertainty [38] obtained by reducing astrometry data against the Gaia star catalogue.”
From Has Kronos Devoured Planet Nine and Its Epigones? (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Has Kronos Devoured Planet Nine and Its Epigones?
Iorio, L. (2026) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe12020042
- Authors
- Jacobson, R. A., & Park, R. S.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2025-01-13
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 65
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W4406365973
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- NASA (80NM0018D0004)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
- Keywords
- Uranus, Uranian satellites, Uranian rings, satellite orbits, gravity field, pole orientation, satellite orientation, astrometry, ring occultation, Voyager 2, Gaia astrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review