The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Multimass Velocity Dispersion Model of 47 Tucanae Indicates No Evidence for an Intermediate-mass Black Hole
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we analyze stellar proper motions in the core of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae to explore the possibility of an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) influence on the stellar dynamics. Our use of short-wavelength photometry affords us an exceedingly clear view of stellar motions into the very center of the crowded core, yielding proper motions for >50,000 stars in the central 2′. We model the velocity dispersion profile of the cluster using an isotropic Jeans model. The density distribution is taken as a central IMBH point mass added to a combination of King templates. We individually model the general low-mass cluster objects (main sequence/giant stars), as well as the concentrated populations of heavy binary systems and dark stellar remnants. Using unbinned likelihood model fitting, we find that the inclusion of the concentrated populations in our model plays a crucial role in fitting for an IMBH mass. The concentrated binaries and stellar-mass black holes (BHs) produce a sufficient velocity dispersion signal in the core so as to make an IMBH unnecessary to fit the observations. We additionally determine that a stellar-mass BH retention fraction of ≳8.5% becomes incompatible with our observed velocities in the core.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Catalog of Parameters for Globular Clusters in the Milky Way
Harris, W. E. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/118116 · Cited by 4,500 · cited 1×
“We have adopted a distance of d = 4.69 kpc from Woodley et al. (2012) who fit spectral energy distributions of 47 Tuc’s WDs. Additionally, our proper motion data only extends to 120′′, a small fraction of the tidal radius, rt ≈ 42′ (Harris 1996, 2010 edition).”
MethodInfluentialGalactic Dynamics: Second Edition
Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9781400828722 · Cited by 4,375
Cited by
First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring
The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., Alef, W., Asada, K., Azulay, R., Baczko, A.-K., Ball, D., Baloković, M., Barrett, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43 · Cited by 1,424
Common-clock very long baseline interferometry using a coherent optical fiber link
Clivati, C., Aiello, R., Bianco, G., Bortolotti, C., De Natale, P., Di Sarno, V., Maddaloni, P., Maccaferri, G., Mura, A., Negusini, M., et al. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.393356 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Mann, C. R., Richer, H., Heyl, J., Anderson, J., Kalirai, J., Caiazzo, I., Möhle, S. D., Knee, A., & Baumgardt, H.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2019-04-08
- Volume
- 875
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2962891736
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multimass Velocity Dispersion Model of 47 Tucanae Indicates No Evidence for an Intermediate-mass Black Hole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0e6d
- The paper
- Mann, C. R., Richer, H., Heyl, J., Anderson, J., Kalirai, J., Caiazzo, I., Möhle, S. D., Knee, A., & Baumgardt, H. (2019). A Multimass Velocity Dispersion Model of 47 Tucanae Indicates No Evidence for an Intermediate-mass Black Hole. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0e6d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.