The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conditions for Reionizing the Universe with a Low Galaxy Ionizing Photon Escape Fraction
Open accessAbstract
We explore scenarios for reionizing the intergalactic medium with low galaxy ionizing photon escape fractions. We combine simulation-based halo mass–dependent escape fractions with an extrapolation of the observed galaxy rest-ultraviolet luminosity functions to solve for the reionization history from z = . We explore the posterior distributions for key unknown quantities, including the limiting halo mass for star formation, the ionizing photon production efficiency, and a potential contribution from active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We marginalize over the allowable parameter space using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, finding a solution that satisfies the most model-independent constraints on reionization. Our fiducial model can match observational constraints with an average escape fraction of <5% throughout the bulk of the epoch of reionization if (i) galaxies form stars down to the atomic cooling limit before reionization and a photosuppression mass of log(M h/M ⊙) ∼ 9 during/after reionization (−13 < M UV,lim < −11), (ii) galaxies become more efficient producers of ionizing photons at higher redshifts and fainter magnitudes, and (iii) there is a significant but subdominant contribution by AGNs at z ≲ 7. In this model, the faintest galaxies (M UV > −15) dominate the ionizing emissivity, leading to an earlier start to reionization and a smoother evolution of the ionized volume-filling fraction than models that assume a single escape fraction at all redshifts and luminosities. The ionizing emissivity from this model is consistent with observations at z = 4–5 (and below, when extrapolated), in contrast to some models that assume a single escape fraction. Our predicted ionized volume-filling fraction at z = 7 of = 78% (±8%) is in modest (∼1 σ–2 σ) tension with observations of Ly α emitters at z ∼ 7 and the damping-wing analyses of the two known z > 7 quasars, which prefer ∼ 40%–50%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
<tt>emcee</tt>: The MCMC Hammer
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/670067 · Cited by 12,414
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · Cited by 10,583
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies
Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., Kinney, A. L., Koornneef, J., & Storchi‐Bergmann, T. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308692 · Cited by 5,717
NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS
Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., Spergel, D. N., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Halpern, M., Hill, R. S., Odegard, N., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 · Cited by 5,121
Madau, P., & Dickinson, M. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 · Cited by 3,898
Ensemble samplers with affine invariance
Goodman, J., & Weare, J. (2010) · Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science · doi:10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 · Cited by 3,075
Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry
Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. (1983) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/160817 · Cited by 2,811
Cited by
The GLASS-JWST Early Release Science Program. I. Survey Design and Release Plans
Treu, T., Roberts-Borsani, G., Bradac, M., Brammer, G., Fontana, A., Henry, A., Mason, C., Morishita, T., Pentericci, L., Wang, X., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Finkelstein, S. L., D’Aloisio, A., Paardekooper, J.-P., Ryan, R., Jr., Behroozi, P., Finlator, K., Livermore, R., Sanderbeck, P. R. U., Vecchia, C. D., & Khochfar, S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2019-07-01
- Volume
- 879
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2953976909
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 173
- FWCI
- 19.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conditions for Reionizing the Universe with a Low Galaxy Ionizing Photon Escape Fraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1ea8
- The paper
- Finkelstein, S. L., D’Aloisio, A., Paardekooper, J.-P., Ryan, R., Jr., Behroozi, P., Finlator, K., Livermore, R., Sanderbeck, P. R. U., Vecchia, C. D., & Khochfar, S. (2019). Conditions for Reionizing the Universe with a Low Galaxy Ionizing Photon Escape Fraction. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1ea8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.