Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conditions for Reionizing the Universe with a Low Galaxy Ionizing Photon Escape Fraction

Open access
Finkelstein, Steven L., D’Aloisio, Anson, Paardekooper, Jan-Pieter, Russell Ryan Jr., Behroozi, Peter, Finlator, Kristian, Livermore, Rachael, Sanderbeck, Phoebe R. Upton, Vecchia, Claudio Dalla, Khochfar, Sadegh·2019·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We explore scenarios for reionizing the intergalactic medium with low galaxy ionizing photon escape fractions. We combine simulation-based halo mass–dependent escape fractions with an extrapolation of the observed galaxy rest-ultraviolet luminosity functions to solve for the reionization history from z = . We explore the posterior distributions for key unknown quantities, including the limiting halo mass for star formation, the ionizing photon production efficiency, and a potential contribution from active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We marginalize over the allowable parameter space using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, finding a solution that satisfies the most model-independent constraints on reionization. Our fiducial model can match observational constraints with an average escape fraction of <5% throughout the bulk of the epoch of reionization if (i) galaxies form stars down to the atomic cooling limit before reionization and a photosuppression mass of log(M h/M ⊙) ∼ 9 during/after reionization (−13 < M UV,lim < −11), (ii) galaxies become more efficient producers of ionizing photons at higher redshifts and fainter magnitudes, and (iii) there is a significant but subdominant contribution by AGNs at z ≲ 7. In this model, the faintest galaxies (M UV > −15) dominate the ionizing emissivity, leading to an earlier start to reionization and a smoother evolution of the ionized volume-filling fraction than models that assume a single escape fraction at all redshifts and luminosities. The ionizing emissivity from this model is consistent with observations at z = 4–5 (and below, when extrapolated), in contrast to some models that assume a single escape fraction. Our predicted ionized volume-filling fraction at z = 7 of = 78% (±8%) is in modest (∼1 σ–2 σ) tension with observations of Ly α emitters at z ∼ 7 and the damping-wing analyses of the two known z > 7 quasars, which prefer ∼ 40%–50%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1ea8

Cites

173 of 173 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 173 references

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Finkelstein, S. L., D’Aloisio, A., Paardekooper, J.-P., Ryan, R., Jr., Behroozi, P., Finlator, K., Livermore, R., Sanderbeck, P. R. U., Vecchia, C. D., & Khochfar, S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
879
Issue
1
Pages
36
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2953976909
Cited by
348
References
173
FWCI
19.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conditions for Reionizing the Universe with a Low Galaxy Ionizing Photon Escape Fraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1ea8
The paper
Finkelstein, S. L., D’Aloisio, A., Paardekooper, J.-P., Ryan, R., Jr., Behroozi, P., Finlator, K., Livermore, R., Sanderbeck, P. R. U., Vecchia, C. D., & Khochfar, S. (2019). Conditions for Reionizing the Universe with a Low Galaxy Ionizing Photon Escape Fraction. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1ea8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.