Cited by 19Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Mass-to-light Ratios of Spatially Resolved Stellar Populations in M31

Open access
Telford, O. Grace, Dalcanton, Julianne J., Williams, Benjamin F., Bell, Eric F., Dolphin, Andrew E., Durbin, Meredith J., Choi, Yumi·2020·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

A galaxy’s stellar mass-to-light ratio ( ) is a useful tool for converting luminosity to stellar mass ( ). However, the practical utility of inferred from stellar population synthesis (SPS) models is limited by mismatches between the real and assumed models for star-formation history (SFH) and dust geometry, both of which vary within galaxies. Here, we measure spatial variations in and their dependence on color, SFH, and dust across the disk of M31, using a map of derived from color–magnitude diagrams of resolved stars in the Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury survey. First, we find comparable scatter in for the optical and mid-IR, contrary to the common idea that is less variable in the IR. Second, we confirm that is correlated with color for both the optical and mid-IR and report color versus relations (CMLRs) in M31 for filters used in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and Widefield Infrared Survey Explorer . Third, we show that the CMLR residuals correlate with recent SFH, such that quiescent regions are offset to higher than star-forming regions at a fixed color. The mid-IR CMLR, however, is not linear due to the high scatter of in star-forming regions. Finally, we find a flatter optical CMLR than any SPS-based CMLRs in the literature. We show that this is an effect of dust geometry, which is typically neglected but should be accounted for when using optical data to map .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/ab701c

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Telford, O. G., Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., Bell, E. F., Dolphin, A. E., Durbin, M. J., & Choi, Y.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • RTX (United States) (US)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Telford, O. Grace
  • Dolphin, Andrew E.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2020-03-01
Volume
891
Issue
1
Pages
32
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W3001177276
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • NSF GRFP (DGE-1256082)
  • STScI (GO-12055)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
mass-to-light ratio, M31, stellar populations, color-magnitude relation, star formation history, dust geometry, resolved stellar populations, color-magnitude diagram, Galactic disk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review