Mass-to-light Ratios of Spatially Resolved Stellar Populations in M31
Open accessAbstract
A galaxy’s stellar mass-to-light ratio ( ) is a useful tool for converting luminosity to stellar mass ( ). However, the practical utility of inferred from stellar population synthesis (SPS) models is limited by mismatches between the real and assumed models for star-formation history (SFH) and dust geometry, both of which vary within galaxies. Here, we measure spatial variations in and their dependence on color, SFH, and dust across the disk of M31, using a map of derived from color–magnitude diagrams of resolved stars in the Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury survey. First, we find comparable scatter in for the optical and mid-IR, contrary to the common idea that is less variable in the IR. Second, we confirm that is correlated with color for both the optical and mid-IR and report color versus relations (CMLRs) in M31 for filters used in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and Widefield Infrared Survey Explorer . Third, we show that the CMLR residuals correlate with recent SFH, such that quiescent regions are offset to higher than star-forming regions at a fixed color. The mid-IR CMLR, however, is not linear due to the high scatter of in star-forming regions. Finally, we find a flatter optical CMLR than any SPS-based CMLRs in the literature. We show that this is an effect of dust geometry, which is typically neglected but should be accounted for when using optical data to map .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MATCH normalizes the IMF by integrating over the full mass range from 0 to ∞, rather than over the finite stellar-mass limits of 0.1-100 M⊙.
“As noted by Telford et al. (2020), MATCH normalizes the IMF by integrating over the full mass range from 0 to ∞ , rather than over the more commonly adopted finite stellar-mass limits of 0 . 1-100 M ⊙ .”
From The Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Southern Treasury (PHAST). II. The Spatially Resolved Recent Star Formation History in M31 (2026) · cites this paper as Telford et al. 2020
Cites
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…uncertain ingredients in modeling evolved stars (e.g., mixing, convective overshooting, dredge-up events, mass-loss rates; Herwig 2005; Conroy 2013; Karakas & Lattanzio 2014) have a larger impact on the mid-IR, where AGB stars provide a larger fraction of the integrated luminosity of a stellar…”
BackgroundLewis, A. R., Dolphin, A. E., Dalcanton, J. J., Weisz, D. R., Williams, B. F., Bell, E. F., Seth, A. C., Simones, J. E., Skillman, E. D., Choi, Y., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/183 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wainer, T. M., Williams, B. F., Chen, Z., Lazzarini, M., Dalcanton, J. J., Bell, E. F., Goold, K., Dolphin, A., Durbin, M. J., Dubón, S. L. F., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae6db9
“As noted by Telford et al. (2020), MATCH normalizes the IMF by integrating over the full mass range from 0 to ∞ , rather than over the more commonly adopted finite stellar-mass limits of 0 .”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Telford, O. G., Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., Bell, E. F., Dolphin, A. E., Durbin, M. J., & Choi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- RTX (United States) (US)
- Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Telford, O. Grace
- Dolphin, Andrew E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2020-03-01
- Volume
- 891
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W3001177276
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- NSF GRFP (DGE-1256082)
- STScI (GO-12055)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- mass-to-light ratio, M31, stellar populations, color-magnitude relation, star formation history, dust geometry, resolved stellar populations, color-magnitude diagram, Galactic disk
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review