The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE CHANDRA DEEP FIELD-SOUTH SURVEY: 7 MS SOURCE CATALOGS
Open accessAbstract
We present X-ray source catalogs for the ≈7 Ms exposure of the Chandra Deep Field-South (CDF-S), which covers a total area of 484.2 arcmin 2. Utilizing wavdetect for initial source detection and ACIS Extract for photometric extraction and significance assessment, we create a main source catalog containing 1008 sources that are detected in up to three X-ray bands: 0.5–7.0 keV, 0.5–2.0 keV, and 2–7 keV. A supplementary source catalog is also provided, including 47 lower-significance sources that have bright ( ) near-infrared counterparts. We identify multiwavelength counterparts for 992 (98.4%) of the main-catalog sources, and we collect redshifts for 986 of these sources, including 653 spectroscopic redshifts and 333 photometric redshifts. Based on the X-ray and multiwavelength properties, we identify 711 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) from the main-catalog sources. Compared to the previous ≈4 Ms CDF-S catalogs, 291 of the main-catalog sources are new detections. We have achieved unprecedented X-ray sensitivity with average flux limits over the central ≈1 arcmin 2 region of ≈1.9 × 10−17, 6.4 × 10−18, and 2.7 × 10−17 erg cm−2 s−1 in the three X-ray bands, respectively. We provide cumulative number-count measurements observing, for the first time, that normal galaxies start to dominate the X-ray source population at the faintest 0.5–2.0 keV flux levels. The highest X-ray source density reaches ≈50,500 deg−2, and 47% ± 4% of these sources are AGNs (≈23,900 deg−2).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.01589 · Cited by 10,720
Cited by
Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?
Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., De Marco, B., Giommi, P., Hickox, R. C., Richards, G. T., Smolčić, V., Hatziminaoglou, E., Mainieri, V., et al. (2017) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 · Cited by 666
Self-citationPrimordial black holes from single field models of inflation
García-Bellido, J., & Ruiz Morales, E. (2017) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2017.09.007 · Cited by 526
What drives the growth of black holes: A decade of progress
Alexander, D. M., Hickox, R. C., Aird, J., Combes, F., Costa, T., Habouzit, M., Harrison, C. M., Leng, R. I., Morabito, L. K., Uckelman, S. L., et al. (2025) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2025.101733 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, B., Brandt, W. N., Xue, Y. Q., Lehmer, B., Alexander, D. M., Bauer, F. E., Vito, F., Yang, G., Basu-Zych, A. R., Comastri, A., Gilli, R., Gu, Q.-S., Hornschemeier, A. E., Koekemoer, A., Liu, T., Mainieri, V., Paolillo, M., Ranalli, P., Rosati, P., Schneider, D. P., Shemmer, O., Smail, I., Sun, M., Tozzi, P., Vignali, C., & Wang, J.-X.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-12-27
- Volume
- 228
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2561905335
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE CHANDRA DEEP FIELD-SOUTH SURVEY: 7 MS SOURCE CATALOGS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4365/228/1/2
- The paper
- Luo, B., Brandt, W. N., Xue, Y. Q., Lehmer, B., Alexander, D. M., Bauer, F. E., Vito, F., Yang, G., Basu-Zych, A. R., Comastri, A., Gilli, R., Gu, Q.-S., Hornschemeier, A. E., Koekemoer, A., Liu, T., Mainieri, V., Paolillo, M., Ranalli, P., Rosati, P., . . . Wang, J.-X. (2017). THE CHANDRA DEEP FIELD-SOUTH SURVEY: 7 MS SOURCE CATALOGS. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/228/1/2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
