Cited by 170Astrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Preionization in Radiative Shocks. I. Self-consistent Models

Open access
Sutherland, Ralph S., Dopita, Michael A.·2017·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

In this paper we treat the preionization problem in shocks over the velocity range 10 < v s < 1500 km s−1 in a self-consistent manner. We identify four distinct classes of solutions controlled by the value of the shock-precursor parameter, , where is the ionization parameter of the UV photons escaping upstream. This parameter determines both the temperature and the degree of ionization of the gas entering the shock. In increasing velocity, the shock solution regimes are cold neutral precursors (v s ≲ 40 km s−1), warm neutral precursors (40 ≲ v s ≲ 75 km s−1), warm partly ionized precursors (75 ≲ v s ≲ 120 km s−1), and fast shocks in which the preshock gas is in photoionization equilibrium and is fully ionized. The main effect of a magnetic field is to push these velocity ranges to higher values and to limit the postshock compression. In order to facilitate comparison with observations of shocks, we provide a number of convenient scaling relationships for parameters, such as postshock temperature, compression factors, cooling lengths, and H β and X-ray luminosity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6541

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hugoniot, 1887, Journal de l’École Polytechnique, 57, 3
  2. Nicholls, 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4403
  3. Press, 1992

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Sutherland, R. S., & Dopita, M. A.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2017-04-01
Volume
229
Issue
2
Pages
34
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2594460894
Cited by
170
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
preionization, radiative shocks, shock precursor, UV photoionization, shock velocity, magnetic field effects, X-ray luminosity, scaling laws

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Preionization in Radiative Shocks. I. Self-consistent Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4365/aa6541
The paper
Sutherland, R. S., & Dopita, M. A. (2017). Effects of Preionization in Radiative Shocks. I. Self-consistent Models. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aa6541