Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler. VIII. A Fully Automated Catalog with Measured Completeness and Reliability Based on Data Release 25

Open access
Thompson, Susan E., Coughlin, Jeffrey L., Hoffman, Kelsey, Mullally, Fergal, Christiansen, Jessie L., Burke, Christopher J., Bryson, Steve, Batalha, Natalie, Haas, Michael R., Catanzarite, Joseph, Rowe, Jason F., Barentsen, Geert, Caldwell, Douglas A., Clarke, Bruce D., Jenkins, Jon M., Li, Jie, Latham, David W., Lissauer, Jack J., Mathur, Savita, Morris, Robert L., Seader, Shawn E., Smith, Jeffrey C., Klaus, Todd C., Twicken, Joseph D., Van Cleve, Jeffrey E., Wohler, Bill, Akeson, Rachel, Ciardi, David R., Cochran, William D., Henze, Christopher E., Howell, Steve B., Huber, Daniel, Prša, Andrej, Ramírez, Solange V., Morton, Timothy D., Barclay, Thomas, Campbell, Jennifer R., Chaplin, William J., Charbonneau, David, Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jørgen, Dotson, Jessie L., Doyle, Laurance, Dunham, Edward W., Dupree, Andrea K., Ford, Eric B., Geary, John C., Girouard, Forrest R., Isaacson, Howard, Kjeldsen, Hans, Quintana, Elisa V., Ragozzine, Darin, Shabram, Megan, Shporer, Avi, Aguirre, Victor Silva, Steffen, Jason H., Still, Martin, Tenenbaum, Peter, Welsh, William F., Wolfgang, Angie, Zamudio, Khadeejah A, Koch, David G., Borucki, William J.·2018·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We present the Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) catalog of transiting exoplanets based on searching 4 yr of Kepler time series photometry (Data Release 25, Q1–Q17). The catalog contains 8054 KOIs, of which 4034 are planet candidates with periods between 0.25 and 632 days. Of these candidates, 219 are new, including two in multiplanet systems (KOI-82.06 and KOI-2926.05) and 10 high-reliability, terrestrial-size, habitable zone candidates. This catalog was created using a tool called the Robovetter, which automatically vets the DR25 threshold crossing events (TCEs). The Robovetter also vetted simulated data sets and measured how well it was able to separate TCEs caused by noise from those caused by low signal-to-noise transits. We discuss the Robovetter and the metrics it uses to sort TCEs. For orbital periods less than 100 days the Robovetter completeness (the fraction of simulated transits that are determined to be planet candidates) across all observed stars is greater than 85%. For the same period range, the catalog reliability (the fraction of candidates that are not due to instrumental or stellar noise) is greater than 98%. However, for low signal-to-noise candidates between 200 and 500 days around FGK-dwarf stars, the Robovetter is 76.7% complete and the catalog is 50.5% reliable. The KOI catalog, the transit fits, and all of the simulated data used to characterize this catalog are available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Cacciari, 2009, MmSAI, 80, 97
  2. Claret, 2000, A&A, 359, 289
  3. Coughlin, 2014, AJ, 147, 119, 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/119 · DOI
  4. He, 2004, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 16, 37
  5. Howell, 2016, AJ, 151, 43, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/43 · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/43
  6. Kreiner, 2004, AcA, 54, 207
  7. Rowe, 2015b, ApJS, 217, 16, 10.1088/0067-0049/217/1/16 · DOI
  8. Samus, 2009, yCat, 1, 2025
  9. Shporer, 2016, ApJ, 829, 34, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/34 · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/34
  10. Tange, 2011, login: The USENIX Magazine, Vol. 36, 42
  11. Thompson, 2016b, Kepler Archive Manual (KDMC-10008-006)

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, S. E., Coughlin, J. L., Hoffman, K., Mullally, F., Christiansen, J. L., Burke, C. J., Bryson, S., Batalha, N., Haas, M. R., Catanzarite, J., Rowe, J. F., Barentsen, G., Caldwell, D. A., Clarke, B. D., Jenkins, J. M., Li, J., Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., Mathur, S., Morris, R. L., Seader, S. E., Smith, J. C., Klaus, T. C., Twicken, J. D., Van Cleve, J. E., Wohler, B., Akeson, R., Ciardi, D. R., Cochran, W. D., Henze, C. E., Howell, S. B., Huber, D., Prša, A., Ramírez, S. V., Morton, T. D., Barclay, T., Campbell, J. R., Chaplin, W. J., Charbonneau, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Dotson, J. L., Doyle, L., Dunham, E. W., Dupree, A. K., Ford, E. B., Geary, J. C., Girouard, F. R., Isaacson, H., Kjeldsen, H., Quintana, E. V., Ragozzine, D., Shabram, M., Shporer, A., Aguirre, V. S., Steffen, J. H., Still, M., Tenenbaum, P., Welsh, W. F., Wolfgang, A., Zamudio, K. A., Koch, D. G., & Borucki, W. J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
235
Issue
2
Pages
38
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2765919264
Cited by
429
References
100
FWCI
28.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler. VIII. A Fully Automated Catalog with Measured Completeness and Reliability Based on Data Release 25. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9
The paper
Thompson, S. E., Coughlin, J. L., Hoffman, K., Mullally, F., Christiansen, J. L., Burke, C. J., Bryson, S., Batalha, N., Haas, M. R., Catanzarite, J., Rowe, J. F., Barentsen, G., Caldwell, D. A., Clarke, B. D., Jenkins, J. M., Li, J., Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., Mathur, S., . . . Borucki, W. J. (2018). Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler. VIII. A Fully Automated Catalog with Measured Completeness and Reliability Based on Data Release 25. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.