Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The California Legacy Survey. I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades

Open access
Rosenthal, Lee J., Fulton, Benjamin J., Hirsch, Lea A., Isaacson, Howard T., Howard, Andrew W., Dedrick, Cayla M., Sherstyuk, Ilya A., Blunt, Sarah C., Petigura, Erik A., Knutson, Heather A., Behmard, Aida, Chontos, Ashley, Crepp, Justin R., Crossfield, Ian J. M., Dalba, Paul A., Fischer, Debra A., Henry, Gregory W., Kane, Stephen R., Kosiarek, Molly, Marcy, Geoffrey W., Rubenzahl, Ryan A., Weiss, Lauren M., Wright, Jason T.·2021·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We present a high-precision radial velocity (RV) survey of 719 FGKM stars, which host 164 known exoplanets and 14 newly discovered or revised exoplanets and substellar companions. This catalog updated the orbital parameters of known exoplanets and long-period candidates, some of which have decades-longer observational baselines than they did upon initial detection. The newly discovered exoplanets range from warm sub-Neptunes and super-Earths to cold gas giants. We present the catalog sample selection criteria, as well as over 100,000 RV measurements, which come from the Keck-HIRES, APF-Levy, and Lick-Hamilton spectrographs. We introduce the new RV search pipeline RVSearch (https://california-planet-search.github.io/rvsearch/) that we used to generate our planet catalog, and we make it available to the public as an open-source Python package. This paper is the first study in a planned series that will measure exoplanet occurrence rates and compare exoplanet populations, including studies of giant planet occurrence beyond the water ice line, and eccentricity distributions to explore giant planet formation pathways. We have made public all radial velocities and associated data that we use in this catalog.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4365/abe23c

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 131 references

Metadata

Authors
Rosenthal, L. J., Fulton, B. J., Hirsch, L. A., Isaacson, H. T., Howard, A. W., Dedrick, C. M., Sherstyuk, I. A., Blunt, S. C., Petigura, E. A., Knutson, H. A., Behmard, A., Chontos, A., Crepp, J. R., Crossfield, I. J. M., Dalba, P. A., Fischer, D. A., Henry, G. W., Kane, S. R., Kosiarek, M., Marcy, G. W., Rubenzahl, R. A., Weiss, L. M., & Wright, J. T.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
255
Issue
1
Pages
8
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W3165634261
Cited by
341
References
131
FWCI
25.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The California Legacy Survey. I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4365/abe23c
The paper
Rosenthal, L. J., Fulton, B. J., Hirsch, L. A., Isaacson, H. T., Howard, A. W., Dedrick, C. M., Sherstyuk, I. A., Blunt, S. C., Petigura, E. A., Knutson, H. A., Behmard, A., Chontos, A., Crepp, J. R., Crossfield, I. J. M., Dalba, P. A., Fischer, D. A., Henry, G. W., Kane, S. R., Kosiarek, M., . . . Wright, J. T. (2021). The California Legacy Survey. I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/abe23c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.