Blackbody radiation from isolated Neptunes
Open accessAbstract
Recent analyses of the orbits of some Kuiper belt objects hypothesize the presence of an undiscovered Neptune-size planet at a very large separation from the Sun. The energy budget of Neptunes on such distant orbits is dominated by the internal heat released by their cooling rather than solar irradiation (making them effectively “isolated”). The blackbody radiation that these planets emit as they cool may provide the means for their detection. Here, we use an analytical toy model to study the cooling and radiation of isolated Neptunes. This model can translate a detection (or a null detection) to a constraint on the size and composition of the hypothesized “Planet Nine.” Specifically, the thick gas atmosphere of Neptune-like planets serves as an insulating blanket that slows down their cooling. Therefore, a measurement of the blackbody temperature, T eff ∼ 50 K , at which a Neptune emits, can be used to estimate the mass of its atmosphere, M atm . Explicitly, we find the relation T eff ∝ M atm 1 / 12 . Despite this weak relation, a measurement of the flux at the Wien tail can constrain the atmospheric mass, at least to within a factor of a few, and provide useful limits to possible formation scenarios of these planets. Finally, we constrain the size and composition of Planet Nine by combining our model with the null results of recent all-sky surveys.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stronger limits can be derived for smaller distances, but such results are model-specific because infrared emission is dominated by internal energy sources, rendering the observational signature dependent on the detailed interior structure of the planet.
“Note that stronger limits can be derived for smaller distances, but such results are model-specific (Meisner et al., 2017a,b). This is because infrared emission is dominated by the internal energy sources of the planet, rendering its observational signature (surface emission in the WISE bands) dependent on the detailed interior structure of the planet (Ginzburg et al., 2016; Linder and Mordasini,”
From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Ginzburg et al., 2016
Interior modeling efforts compute physical radii of 1.9-3.7 R for an isolated 10 M object.
“Such estimates are further consistent with the interior modeling e orts of Linder and Mordasini (2016) who compute physical radii of 1 : 9 3 : 7 R for an isolated 10 M object (see also Ginzburg et al. 2016).”
From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Ginzburg et al. 2016
Cites
Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System
Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22 · Cited by 432 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The presence of an outer undetected planet in the solar system has been recently suggested, due to possible evidence of its gravitational influence on the orbits of Kuiper belt objects (de la Fuente Marcos & de la Fuente Marcos 2014; Trujillo & Sheppard 2014; Batygin & Brown 2016).”
BackgroundA Sedna-like body with a perihelion of 80 astronomical units
Trujillo, C. A., & Sheppard, S. S. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13156 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., Brown, M. E., & Becker, J. C. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Consequences of a Distant Massive Planet on the Large Semimajor Axis Trans-Neptunian Objects
Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J. J., Lawler, S. M., Gladman, B. J., & Bannister, M. T. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/63 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
THE HUNT FOR PLANET NINE: ATMOSPHERE, SPECTRA, EVOLUTION, AND DETECTABILITY
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Laughlin, G., Nettelmann, N., Morley, C. V., Lupu, R. E., Visscher, C., Jeremic, P., Khadder, W. G., & Hargrave, M. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/l25 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ginzburg, S., Sari, R., & Loeb, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-04-27
- Volume
- 822
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L11
- ISSN
- 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-8213
- OpenAlex
- W2295405998
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Keywords
- Planet Nine, blackbody radiation, planetary cooling, atmospheric mass, effective temperature, Kuiper belt objects, undiscovered planet, planet formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review