Cited by 13Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Simulations of the solar system’s early dynamical evolution with a self-gravitating planetesimal disk

Open access
Fan, Siteng, Batygin, Konstantin·2017·The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract

Abstract Over the course of the last decade, the Nice model has dramatically changed our view of the solar system’s formation and early evolution. Within the context of this model, a transient period of planet–planet scattering is triggered by gravitational interactions between the giant planets and a massive primordial planetesimal disk, leading to a successful reproduction of the solar system’s present-day architecture. In typical realizations of the Nice model, self-gravity of the planetesimal disk is routinely neglected, as it poses a computational bottleneck to the calculations. Recent analyses have shown, however, that a self-gravitating disk can exhibit behavior that is dynamically distinct, and this disparity may have significant implications for the solar system’s evolutionary path. In this work, we explore this discrepancy utilizing a large suite of Nice model simulations with and without a self-gravitating planetesimal disk, taking advantage of the inherently parallel nature of graphic processing units. Our simulations demonstrate that self-consistent modeling of particle interactions does not lead to significantly different final planetary orbits from those obtained within conventional simulations. Moreover, self-gravitating calculations show similar planetesimal evolution to non-self-gravitating numerical experiments after dynamical instability is triggered, suggesting that the orbital clustering observed in the distant Kuiper Belt is unlikely to have a self-gravitational origin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0b

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inclination instability does not naturally manifest in numerical simulations of Kuiper belt emplacement that self-consistently account for self-gravity of the planetesimal disk, calling into question the specificity of initial conditions required for this model to operate.

    “Moreover, the inclination instability does not naturally manifest in numerical simulations of Kuiper belt emplacement that self-consistently account for self-gravity of the planetesimal disk, calling into question the specificity of initial conditions required for this model to operate (Fan and Batygin, 2017).”

    From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Fan and Batygin, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The planet nine hypothesis

    Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., Brown, M. E., & Becker, J. C. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009 · Cited by 181 · see citing works

    “Moreover, the inclination instability does not naturally manifest in numerical simulations of Kuiper belt emplacement that self-consistently account for self-gravity of the planetesimal disk, calling into question the specificity of initial conditions required for this model to operate (Fan and Batygin, 2017).”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Authors
Fan, S., & Batygin, K.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, Siteng
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2017-12-18
Volume
851
Issue
2
Pages
L37
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2779626617
Cited by
13
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
Nice model, planet-planet scattering, giant planet migration, solar system formation, orbital clustering, Kuiper belt, dynamical instability, GPU parallel computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review