The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
A mutualistic symbiosis between a dark septate endophytic fungus, Heteroconium chaetospira, and a nonmycorrhizal plant, Chinese cabbage
Abstract
Symbiotic microorganisms, such as mycorrhizal fungi, are known to associate with most plants; however members of the Cruciferae are an exception. We investigated nutrient exchange between a dark septate endophytic fungus, Heteroconium chaetospira, and Chinese cabbage plants (Cruciferae) in vitro. Chinese cabbage could not use some amino acids, while the fungus-treated plants were able to use all of the nitrogen forms provided. To demonstrate that nitrogen transfer occurs between the fungus and the host plant, we used a hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane compartment system, which restricts diffusion and mass flow of ions and allows only fungal penetration. Our results strongly suggest that H. chaetospira provided nitrogen to the plant, rather than the plant mineralizing available organic nitrogen. In addition carbon transfer from the host plant to the fungus was demonstrated with HPLC and (l3)CO2-labeling experiments. When H. chaetospira colonized host plant roots under low glucose condition, ergosterol content in culture pot (as an index of fungal biomass) increased significantly compared to the fungal treatment without a host plant. Sucrose concentration in the host root significantly decreased as a result of fungal colonization, and mannitol (a specific carbon source to fungal cells) increased in the roots. Sucrose and mannitol in the host root treated with the fungus were labeled clearly by 13C after 1C-labeled CO2 was provided to the plant. These results suggest that the fungus obtained carbon, mainly as sucrose, from the host plant. We show for the first time the existence of a fungus establishing a mutualistic association with a nonmycorrhizal Cruciferae plant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems
Toju, H., Peay, K. G., Yamamichi, M., Narisawa, K., Hiruma, K., Naito, K., Fukuda, S., Ushio, M., Nakaoka, S., Onoda, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0139-4 · Cited by 1,077
Self-citationA meta‐analysis of plant responses to dark septate root endophytes
Newsham, K. K. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03611.x · Cited by 665
Drobek, M., Frąc, M., & Cybulska, J. (2019) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy9060335 · Cited by 534
Fungal endophytes and their interactions with plants in phytoremediation: A review
Deng, Z., & Cao, L. (2017) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.097 · Cited by 300
Almario, J., Jeena, G., Wunder, J., Langen, G., Zuccaro, A., Coupland, G., & Bucher, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1710455114 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Usuki, F., & Narisawa, K.
- Venue
- Mycologia
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-184
- ISSN
- 0027-5514 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145272290
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A mutualistic symbiosis between a dark septate endophytic fungus, Heteroconium chaetospira, and a nonmycorrhizal plant, Chinese cabbage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3852/mycologia.99.2.175
- The paper
- Usuki, F., & Narisawa, K. (2007). A mutualistic symbiosis between a dark septate endophytic fungus, Heteroconium chaetospira, and a nonmycorrhizal plant, Chinese cabbage. Mycologia. https://doi.org/10.3852/mycologia.99.2.175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.