The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are the earliest field monuments of the Pacific landscape serial sites? In A Pacific Odyssey: Archaeology and Anthropology in the Western Pacific. Papers in Honour of Jim Specht
Abstract
Explanations of the origin and genesis of Pacific field monuments commonly assume they reflect local social change in islands or island groups which were increasingly isolated following colonization. A recent review of early West Polynesian archaeology suggests that the penecontemporaneous appearance of various kinds of field monuments from eastern Melanesia to Polynesia may be better explained as evidence of interaction and the movement of people and/or ideas, possibly associated with the colonization of East Polynesia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, the rise of monumental, ceremonial architecture within a much shorter regional chronology (25) implies a different kind of historical development as well as likely continuity with comparable structures in western Polynesia (12, 26).”
From High-precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid initial human colonization of East Polynesia (2011) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wilmshurst, J. M., Hunt, T. L., Lipo, C. P., & Anderson, A. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1015876108 · Cited by 593
Cultural Chronology of Earthworks in Palau, Western Micronesia
Liston, J. (2009) · Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania · doi:10.1002/j.1834-4453.2009.tb00047.x · Cited by 99
Explaining Fortifications in Indo‐Pacific Prehistory
Field, J. S. (2008) · Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania · doi:10.1002/j.1834-4453.2008.tb00025.x · Cited by 35
Monumental architecture in West Polynesia: origins, chiefs and archaeological approaches
Clark, G., & Martinsson‐Wallin, H. (2007) · Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania · doi:10.1002/j.1834-4453.2007.tb00006.x · Cited by 32
McCoy, M. D., Alderson, H. A., Hemi, R., Cheng, H., & Edwards, R. L. (2016) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2016.08.002 · Cited by 22
“Following on previous studies of monuments (Smith, 2004; Clark and Martinsson-Wallin, 2007), we exclude Pacific Island”
MethodDotte-Sarout, É. (2010) · Éditions de la Sorbonne eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.psorbonne.5942 · Cited by 3
Sand, C. (2004) · Records of the Australian Museum Supplement · doi:10.3853/j.0812-7387.29.2004.1407 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, A.
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Anita
- ORCID
- Smith, Anita
- Venue
- Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement
- Publisher
- Australian Museum
- Published
- 2004-05-19
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 133-138
- ISSN
- 0812-7387 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034702184
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Records of the Australian Museum Supplement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Keywords
- Pacific archaeology, East Polynesia, Melanesia, human migration, intercultural relations, colonization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
