The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MRI contrast agents: Classification and application (Review)
Open accessAbstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents are categorised according to the following specific features: chemical composition including the presence or absence of metal atoms, route of administration, magnetic properties, effect on the magnetic resonance image, biodistribution and imaging applications. The majority of these agents are either paramagnetic ion complexes or superparamagnetic magnetite particles and contain lanthanide elements such as gadolinium (Gd3+) or transition metal manganese (Mn2+). These elements shorten the T1 or T2 relaxation time, thereby causing increased signal intensity on T1-weighted images or reduced signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Most paramagnetic contrast agents are positive agents. These agents shorten the T1, so the enhanced parts appear bright on T1-weighted images. Dysprosium, superparamagnetic agents and ferromagnetic agents are negative contrast agents. The enhanced parts appear darker on T2-weighted images. MRI contrast agents incorporating chelating agents reduces storage in the human body, enhances excretion and reduces toxicity. MRI contrast agents may be administered orally or intravenously. According to biodistribution and applications, MRI contrast agents may be categorised into three types: extracellular fluid, blood pool and target/organ-specific agents. A number of contrast agents have been developed to selectively distinguish liver pathologies. Some agents are also capable of targeting other organs, inflammation as well as specific tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in the Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Wang, W., & Wei, C. (2020) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2020.01.014 · Cited by 492
Stimuli-Responsive Polymer-Based Nanosystems for Cancer Theranostics
Wei, D., Sun, Y., Zhu, H., & Fu, Q. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c06019 · Cited by 303
Magnetic Iron Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Surface Enhancements, and Biological Challenges
Vargas-Ortiz, J. R., Gonzalez, C., & Esquivel, K. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10112282 · Cited by 62
Tomitaka, A., Vashist, A., Kolishetti, N., & Nair, M. (2023) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/d3na00180f · Cited by 45
Applications and Efficacy of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in the Treatment of Brain Tumors
Varalli, L., Berlet, R., Abenojar, E., McDaid, J., Gascoigne, D. A., Bailes, J., & Aksenov, D. P. (2025) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics17040499 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, Y.-D., Paudel, R., Liu, J., Ma, C., Zhang, Z.-S., & Zhou, S.-K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Medicine
- Publisher
- Spandidos Publications
- Published
- 2016-09-21
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1319-1326
- ISSN
- 1107-3756 (ISSN-L)
- 1791-244X
- OpenAlex
- W2523155661
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRI contrast agents: Classification and application (Review). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2744
- The paper
- Xiao, Y.-D., Paudel, R., Liu, J., Ma, C., Zhang, Z.-S., & Zhou, S.-K. (2016). MRI contrast agents: Classification and application (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.