Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ERGO: A pilot study of ketogenic diet in recurrent glioblastoma

Open access
RIEGER, JOHANNES, BÄHR, OLIVER, MAURER, GABRIELE D., HATTINGEN, ELKE, FRANZ, KEA, BRUCKER, DANIEL, WALENTA, STEFAN, KÄMMERER, ULRIKE, COY, JOHANNES F., WELLER, MICHAEL, STEINBACH, JOACHIM P.·2014·International Journal of Oncology

Abstract

Limiting dietary carbohydrates inhibits glioma growth in preclinical models. Therefore, the ERGO trial (NCT00575146) examined feasibility of a ketogenic diet in 20 patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients were put on a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet containing plant oils. Feasibility was the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints included the percentage of patients reaching urinary ketosis, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. The effects of a ketogenic diet alone or in combination with bevacizumab was also explored in an orthotopic U87MG glioblastoma model in nude mice. Three patients (15%) discontinued the diet for poor tolerability. No serious adverse events attributed to the diet were observed. Urine ketosis was achieved at least once in 12 of 13 (92%) evaluable patients. One patient achieved a minor response and two patients had stable disease after 6 weeks. Median PFS of all patients was 5 (range, 3-13) weeks, median survival from enrollment was 32 weeks. The trial allowed to continue the diet beyond progression. Six of 7 (86%) patients treated with bevacizumab and diet experienced an objective response, and median PFS on bevacizumab was 20.1 (range, 12-124) weeks, for a PFS at 6 months of 43%. In the mouse glioma model, ketogenic diet alone had no effect on median survival, but increased that of bevacizumab-treated mice from 52 to 58 days (p<0.05). In conclusion, a ketogenic diet is feasible and safe but probably has no significant clinical activity when used as single agent in recurrent glioma. Further clinical trials are necessary to clarify whether calorie restriction or the combination with other therapeutic modalities, such as radiotherapy or anti-angiogenic treatments, could enhance the efficacy of the ketogenic diet.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3892/ijo.2014.2382

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
RIEGER, J., BÄHR, O., MAURER, G. D., HATTINGEN, E., FRANZ, K., BRUCKER, D., WALENTA, S., KÄMMERER, U., COY, J. F., WELLER, M., & STEINBACH, J. P.
Venue
International Journal of Oncology
Published
2014-04-11
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1843-1852
ISSN
  • 1019-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1791-2423
OpenAlex
W2143786940
Cited by
287
References
49
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERGO: A pilot study of ketogenic diet in recurrent glioblastoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3892/ijo.2014.2382
The paper
RIEGER, J., BÄHR, O., MAURER, G. D., HATTINGEN, E., FRANZ, K., BRUCKER, D., WALENTA, S., KÄMMERER, U., COY, J. F., WELLER, M., & STEINBACH, J. P. (2014). ERGO: A pilot study of ketogenic diet in recurrent glioblastoma. International Journal of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2382

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.