Investigation of the relative biological effectiveness and uniform isobiological killing effects of irradiation with a clinical carbon SOBP beam on DNA repair deficient CHO cells
Open accessAbstract
Spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) C ions have been used clinically in charged particle radiation therapy for years. An SOBP beam consists of various monoenergetic Bragg peaks; however, the biological effect of irradiation with an SOBP beam track has not been well-studied. In order to determine the clinically prospective molecular targets, radiosensitivity to the beam track in DNA repair deficient cell lines was investigated. A total of four distinct Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines, including CHO10B2 (wild-type), V3 (protein kinase DNA-activated catalytic polypeptide deficient), 51D1 (RAD51 paralog D deficient) and PADR9 [poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) deficient], were irradiated with gamma-rays, C ions (290 MeV/n) and Fe ions (500 MeV/n), in order to compare cellular lethality. An OptiCell™ culture system was used to evaluate the lethality at distinct depths of SOBP C ions. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values of C ions (linear energy transfer (LET), 13 and 70 keV/µm) and Fe ions (LET, 200 keV/µm) were calculated from cell survival using colony formation assay with standard cell dishes. All cell lines exhibited similar sensitivity to 70 keV/µm C ions and 200 keV/µm Fe ions. Furthermore, V3 cells did not exhibit increased sensitivity to high LET C ions and Fe ions, compared with low LET gamma-rays and C ions, and 51D1 cells irradiated with 13 keV/µm C ions exhibited relatively high RBE values among the tested cell lines. Conversely, PADR9 cells exhibited low RBE values for 13 keV/µm C ions and high RBE values for 70 keV/µm C ions. Obtained using the OptiCell system, the survival fractions in the SOBP region were uniform for wild-type and PADR9 cells. Conversely, V3 and 51D1 cells exhibited decreased cell death in the distal region of the SOBP. These results indicated that PARP is a more effective target for clinical beam therapy, compared with the non-homologous end joining repair and homologous recombination repair pathways. PARP deficiency may be an optimal target for C ion therapy and the results of the present study may contribute to the development of a more effective heavy ion radiation therapy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For CHO cells, the maximum percentage displacement between simulations and data is 10% at 200 keV per micrometer from [28], 10% at 780 keV per micrometer, 25% at 1200 keV per micrometer, and 25% at 2000 keV per micrometer.
“In particular, the maximum percentage displacement between simulations and data is 10% for the 200 keV µm -1 data taken from [28], 10% at 780 keV µm -1 , 25% at 1200 keV µm -1 , and 25% at 2000 keV µm -1 .”
From Radiobiological damage by space radiation: extension of the BIANCA model to heavy ions up to iron, and pilot application to cosmic ray exposure (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Sunada, S., Cartwright, I. M., Hirakawa, H., Fujimori, A., Uesaka, M., & Kato, T. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Colorado State University (US)
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (JP)
- Venue
- Oncology Letters
- Publisher
- Spandidos Publications
- Published
- 2017-04-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4911-4916
- ISSN
- 1792-1074 (ISSN-L)
- 1792-1082
- PMC
- PMC5453035
- OpenAlex
- W2606835151
- Semantic Scholar
- 65bcdc05aa5c96f1c04aa6c31c1e87f41cf3620e
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Oncology Letters (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (15H05935)
- University of Tokyo
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15J09331, 15H05935)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Keywords
- spread-out Bragg peak, carbon ion radiotherapy, relative biological effectiveness, DNA repair deficiency, non-homologous end joining, homologous recombination, linear energy transfer, cell survival, CHO cells, radiosensitivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review