Cited by 3Invertebrate Immune Response MechanismsAnimal Behavior and ReproductionCrustacean biology and ecology

Immune priming in Armadillidium vulgare against Salmonella enterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits?

Open access
Prigot-Maurice, Cybèle, Depeux, Charlotte, Paulhac, Hélène, Braquart-Varnier, Christine, Beltran-Bech, Sophie·2022·ZooKeys

Abstract

Invertebrate immune priming is defined as an enhanced protection against secondary pathogenic infections when individuals have been previously exposed to the same or a different pathogen. Immune priming can be energetically costly for individuals, thus impacting trade-offs between life-history traits, like reproduction, growth, and lifetime. Here, the reproductive cost(s) and senescence patterns of immune priming against S. enterica in the common woodlouse A. vulgare (Crustacea, Isopoda) were investigated. Four different groups of females were used that either (1) have never been injected (control), (2) were injected twice with S. enterica (7 days between infections), (3) were firstly injected with LB-broth, then with S. enterica, and (4) females injected only once with S. enterica. All females were allowed to breed with one non-infected male and were observed for eight months. Then, the number of clutches produced, the time taken to produce the clutch(es), the number of offspring in each clutch, the senescence biomarkers of females, and parameters of their haemocytes were compared. The result was that immune priming did not significantly impact reproductive abilities, senescence patterns, and haemocyte parameters of female A. vulgare, but had an indirect effect through body weight. The lighter immune primed females took less time to produce the first clutch, which contained less offspring, but they were more likely to produce a second clutch. The opposite effects were observed in the heavier immune primed females. By highlighting that immune priming was not as costly as expected in A. vulgare, these results provide new insights into the adaptive nature of this immune process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3897/zookeys.1101.77216

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 3

Authors
Prigot-Maurice, C., Depeux, C., Paulhac, H., Braquart-Varnier, C., & Beltran-Bech, S.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
ZooKeys
Published
2022-05-18
Volume
1101
Pages
131-158
ISSN
  • 1313-2970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1313-2989
OpenAlex
W4280562800
Cited by
3
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ZooKeys (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ZooKeys (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Université de Poitiers
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
Keywords
immune priming, Armadillidium vulgare, Salmonella enterica, life-history trade-offs, reproductive costs, senescence, hemocytes, body weight, secondary infection, invertebrate immunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review