The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool
Open accessAbstract
GeoCAT is an open source, browser based tool that performs rapid geospatial analysis to ease the process of Red Listing taxa. Developed to utilise spatially referenced primary occurrence data, the analysis focuses on two aspects of the geographic range of a taxon: the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO). These metrics form part of the IUCN Red List categories and criteria and have often proved challenging to obtain in an accurate, consistent and repeatable way. Within a familiar Google Maps environment, GeoCAT users can quickly and easily combine data from multiple sources such as GBIF, Flickr and Scratchpads as well as user generated occurrence data. Analysis is done with the click of a button and is visualised instantly, providing an indication of the Red List threat rating, subject to meeting the full requirements of the criteria. Outputs including the results, data and parameters used for analysis are stored in a GeoCAT file that can be easily reloaded or shared with collaborators. GeoCAT is a first step toward automating the data handling process of Red List assessing and provides a valuable hub from which further developments and enhancements can be spawned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6872 · Cited by 12,728
How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B., & Worm, B. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 · Cited by 3,045 · cited 1×
“Recent estimates suggest there could be 8.7 million (± 1.3 million) species on the planet (Mora et al. 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialCbd (2017) · Cited by 478
Scale Dependency of Rarity, Extinction Risk, and Conservation Priority
HARTLEY, S., & KUNIN, W. E. (2003) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00015.x · Cited by 287
Callmander, M. W., Schatz, G. E., Lowry, P. P., Laivao, M. O., Raharimampionona, J., Andriambololonera, S., Raminosoa, T., & Consiglio, T. (2007) · Oryx · doi:10.1017/s0030605307001731 · Cited by 116
A NONPARAMETRIC TEST FOR EXTINCTION BASED ON A SIGHTING RECORD
Solow, A. R., & Roberts, D. L. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1329:antfeb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 112
McPherson, J. M., & Myers, R. A. (2009) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00596.x · Cited by 54
Collen, B., Purvis, A., & Mace, G. M. (2010) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00689.x · Cited by 43
Smith, V., Rycroft, S. D., Harman, K. T., Scott, B., & Roberts, D. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-s14-s6 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Cited by
Progress, challenges and opportunities for Red Listing
Bachman, S. P., Field, R., Reader, T., Raimondo, D., Donaldson, J., Schatz, G. E., & Lughadha, E. N. (2019) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.002 · Cited by 192
Self-citationAbedin, I., Putra, A., Kang, H.-E., Singh, A., Singh, S., Jung, W.-K., Kim, H.-W., & Kundu, S. (2025) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7140563/v1 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A., de la Torre, J., & Scott, B.
- Venue
- ZooKeys
- Publisher
- Pensoft Publishers
- Published
- 2011-11-28
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 150
- Pages
- 117-126
- ISSN
- 1313-2970 (ISSN-L)
- 1313-2989
- OpenAlex
- W2035885706
- Cited by
- 2,364
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
- The paper
- Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A., de la Torre, J., & Scott, B. (2011). Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.