Mapping the expansion of coyotes (Canis latrans) across North and Central America
Open accessAbstract
The geographic distribution of coyotes ( Canislatrans ) has dramatically expanded since 1900, spreading across much of North America in a period when most other mammal species have been declining. Although this considerable expansion has been well documented at the state/provincial scale, continent-wide descriptions of coyote spread have portrayed conflicting distributions for coyotes prior to the 1900s, with popularly referenced anecdotal accounts showing them restricted to the great plains, and more obscure, but data-rich accounts suggesting they ranged across the arid west. To provide a scientifically credible map of the coyote’s historical range (10,000–300 BP) and describe their range expansion from 1900 to 2016, we synthesized archaeological and fossil records, museum specimens, peer-reviewed reports, and records from wildlife management agencies. Museum specimens confirm that coyotes have been present in the arid west and California throughout the Holocene, well before European colonization. Their range in the late 1800s was undistinguishable from earlier periods, and matched the distribution of non-forest habitat in the region. Coyote expansion began around 1900 as they moved north into taiga forests, east into deciduous forests, west into costal temperate rain forests, and south into tropical rainforests. Forest fragmentation and the extirpation of larger predators probably enabled these expansions. In addition, hybridization with wolves ( C.lupus , C.lycaon , and/or C.rufus ) and/or domestic dogs has been documented in the east, and suspected in the south. Our detailed account of the original range of coyotes and their subsequent expansion provides the core description of a large scale ecological experiment that can help us better understand the predator-prey interactions, as well as evolution through hybridization.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While coyotes are found in nearly all ecosystems in North America, observations of melanistic coyotes are uncommon.
“While coyotes are found in nearly all ecosystems in North America (Mowry & Edge, 2014;Caudill & Caudill, 2015;Hody & Kays, 2018), observations of melanistic coyotes are uncommon.”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Hody & Kays, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Range Contractions of North American Carnivores and Ungulates
LALIBERTE, A. S., & RIPPLE, W. J. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0123:rconac]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?
BERGER, K. M., & GESE, E. M. (2007) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01287.x · Cited by 398 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and/or C. lycaon) and cougar (Puma concolor) across most of eastern North America, and the decline of cougar and jaguar (Panthera onca) in Central America probably set the stage for coyote colonization (Bekoff and Gese 2003, Berger and Gese 2007, Cove et al. 2012, Méndez-Carvajal and Moreno 2014).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- Adams JR Leonard JA Waits LP (2003) Widespread occurrence of a domestic dog mitochondrial DNA haplotype in southeastern US coyotes. Molecular Ecology 12(2): 541– 546. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01708.x 12535104 · DOI
- Andelt WF (1987) Coyote predation. In: Novak M (Ed.) Wild furbearer management and conservation in North America. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, 128– 140.
- Arroyo-Cabrales J Alvarez T (2003) A preliminary report of the late Quaternary mammal fauna from Loltún Cave, Yucatán, México. In: Schubert BW, Mead J., Graham RW (Eds) Ice Age cave faunas of North America. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 262–272.
- Bekoff M Gese EM (2003) Coyote (Canis latrans). In: Feldhamer B Thompson C Chapman JA (Eds) Wild mammals of North America: Biology, management, and conservation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 467– 481.
- Bermúdez SEC (2013) Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae, Argasidae) of coyotes in Panama. Systematic and Applied Acarology 18(2): 112– 115. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.2.2 · DOI
- Chubbs TE Phillips FR (2005) Evidence of range expansion of eastern coyotes, Canis latrans, in Labrador. Canadian Field-Naturalist 119: 381– 384. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v119i3.149 · DOI
- Cluff HD (2006) Extension of Coyote, Canis latrans, breeding range in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 120: 67– 70. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v120i1.248 · DOI
- Constable H Guralnick R Wieczorek J Spencer C Peterson AT Bart H Bates J Cotter G Hanken J Moritz C Simmons N Trueb L (2010) VertNet: A new model for biodiversity data sharing. PLoS Biology 8: e1000309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000309 PMC2821892 20169109 · DOI
- Cook BI Anchukaitis KJ Kaplan JO Puma MJ Kelley M Gueyffier D (2012) Pre-Columbian deforestation as an amplifier of drought in Mesoamerica. Geophysical Research Letters 39: 2– 6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052565 · DOI
- Cove MV Pardo VLE Spínola RM Jackson VL Sáenz JC (2012) Coyote Canis latrans (Carnivora: Canidae) Range extension in northeastern Costa Rica: Possible explanations and consequences. Latin American Journal of Conservation 3: 82– 86.
- Crête M Ouellet J-P Tremblay J-P Arsenault R (2001) Suitability of the forest landscape for coyotes in norteastern North America and its implications for coexistence with other carnivores. Ecoscience 8: 311– 319. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2001.11682658 · DOI
- Denevan WM (1992) The pristine myth: The landscape of the Americas in 1492. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 82: 369– 385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1992.tb01965.x · DOI
- Emery KF (1999) Continuity and variability in Postclassic and colonial animal use at Lamanai and Tipu, Belize. In: White CD (Ed.) Reconstructing ancient Maya diet. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, 61– 82.
- Fener HM Ginsberg JR Sanderson EW Gompper ME (2005) Chronology of range expansion of the Coyote, Canis latrans, in New York. Canadian Field-Naturalist 119: 1– 5. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v119i1.74 · DOI · Paper page
- Feranec RS (2004) Geographic variation in the diet of hypsodont herbivores from the Rancholabrean of Florida. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 207: 359– 369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(04)00047-1 · DOI
- Feranec RS MacFadden BJ (2000) Evolution of the grazing niche in Pleistocene mammals from Florida: Evidence from stable isotopes. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 162: 155– 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00110-3 · DOI
- Gier HT (1975) Ecology and social behavior of the coyote. In: Fox MW (Ed.) The wild canids. Von Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA, 247– 262.
- Gompper ME (2002) Top carnivores in the suburbs? Ecological by colonization issues raised by colonization of north-eastern North America by coyotes. BioScience 52: 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0185:TCITSE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Grinnell J Dixon JS Linsdale JM (1937) Fur-bearing mammals of California: Their natural history, systematic status and relations to man. University of California Press, Berkeley, 777 pp.
- Hidalgo-Mihart MG Cantú-Salazar L González-Romero A López-González CA (2004) Historical and present distribution of coyote (Canis latrans) in Mexico and Central America. Journal of Biogeography 31: 2025– 2038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01163.x · DOI
- Hidalgo-Mihart MG Contreras-Moreno FM Pérez-Solano LA Hernández-Lara C (2013) Primeros registros de coyote (Canis latrans) en Campeche, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 1012– 1017. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.33108 · DOI
- Hill EP Sumner PW Wooding JB (1987) Human influences on range expansion of coyotes in the southeast. Wildlife Society Bulletin 15(4): 521– 524.
- Hody JW (2016) Canid collision - Range expansion by coyotes (Canis latrans) and crab-eating foxes (Cerdocyon thous) in Panama and interpretation of camera trap data. MS thesis, Raleigh, USA: North Carolina State University. https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/handle/1840.20/33317
- Ingraham RC (2011) Specialized taphonomies in an eastern Maine shell midden: Faunal analysis of Site 62-8, Holmes Point West, Machias, Maine. MS thesis, Orono, USA: University of Maine. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/1615
- Kays R Curtis A Kirchman JJ (2010) Rapid adaptive evolution of northeastern coyotes via hybridization with wolves. Biology Letters 6: 89– 93. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0575 19776058 PMC2817252 · DOI
- Kays RW Gompper ME Ray JC (2008) Landscape ecology of eastern coyotes based on large-scale estimates of abundance. Ecological Applications 18: 1014– 1027. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0298.1 18536259 · DOI
- Kimmerer RW Lake FK (2001) The role of indigenous burning in land management. Journal of Forestry 99(11): 36– 41.
- Knowlton FF Gese EM Jaeger MM (1999) Coyote depredation control: An interface between biology and management. Journal of Range Management 52: 398– 412. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003773 · DOI
- Leigh EG O’Dea A Vermeij GJ (2014) Historical biogeography of the Isthmus of Panama. Biological Reviews 89: 148– 172. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12048 23869709 · DOI
- Levi T Kilpatrick AM Mangel M Wilmers CC (2012) Deer, predators, and the emergence of Lyme disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 10942– 10947. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204536109/-/DCSupplemental.www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1204536109 PMC3390851 22711825 · DOI
- Levy S (2012) Rise of the coyote: The new top dog. Nature 485: 296– 297. https://doi.org/10.1038/485296a 22596135 · DOI
- Lucas SG Alvarado GE Vega E (1997) The Pleistocene mammals of Costa Rica. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 17: 413– 427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1997.10010985 · DOI
- Macdonald DW Sillero-Zubiri C (2004) The biology and conservation of wild canids. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 450 pp https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515562.001.0001 · DOI
- MacDonald SO Cook JA (2009) Recent mammals of Alaska. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks, 387 pp.
- Marshall LG Webb SD Sepkoski JJ Raup DM (1982) Mammalian evolution and the Great American Interchange. Science 215: 1351– 1357. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.215.4538.1351 17753000 · DOI
- Meachen JA Janowicz AC Avery JE Sadleir RW (2014) Ecological changes in coyotes (Canis latrans) in response to the Ice Age megafaunal extinctions. PLoS ONE 9: e116041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116041 PMC4281224 25551387 · DOI
- Meachen JA Samuels JX (2012) Evolution in coyotes (Canis latrans) in response to the megafaunal extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 4191– 4196. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113788109 PMC3306717 22371581 · DOI
- Méndez-Carvajal P Moreno R (2014) Mammalia, Carnivora, Canidae, Canis latrans (Say, 1823): Actual distribution in Panama. Check List 10: 376– 379. https://doi.org/10.15560/10.2.376 · DOI
- Moore GC Parker GR (1992) Colonization by the eastern coyote (Canis latrans). In: Boer AH (Ed.) Ecology and management of the eastern coyote. Wildlife Research Unit, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 23– 38.
- Nowak RM (1978) Evolution and taxonomy of coyotes and related Canis. In: Bekoff M (Ed.) Coyotes: Biology, behavior, and management. Academic Press, Inc., New York, 3– 16.
- Nowak RM (2002) The original status of wolves in eastern North America. Southeastern Naturalist 1(2): 95–130. https://doi.org/10.1656/1528-7092(2002)001[0095:TOSOWI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Pardi MI Smith FA (2016) Biotic responses of canids to the terminal Pleistocene megafauna extinction. Ecography 39: 141– 151. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01596 · DOI
- Patterson BR Messier F (2003) Age and condition of deer killed by coyotes in Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81: 1894– 1898. https://doi.org/10.1139/z03-189 · DOI
- Peña-Mondragón JL Castillo Álvarez A Benítez-Malvido J (2014) Primer registro de coyote (Canis latrans) en la región de La Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 30(3): 696– 700.
- Ramankutty N Foley JA (2010) ISLSCP II Potential Natural Vegetation Cover. In: Hall FG, Collatz G, Meeson B, Los S, Brown de Colstoun E, Landis D (Eds) ISLSCP Initiative II Collection. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/961 · DOI
- Sacks BN Brown SK Ernest HB (2004) Population structure of California coyotes corresponds to habitat-specific breaks and illuminates species history. Molecular Ecology 13: 1265– 1275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02110.x 15078462 · DOI
- Simpson GG (1980) Splendid isolation: The curious history of South American mammals. Yale University Press, New Haven, 266 pp.
- Sosa-Escalante J Hernández S Segovia A Sánchez-Cordero V (1997) First record of the coyote, Canis latrans, in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 42(4): 494– 495.
- Stewart FL (1976) Coyote in New Brunswick during prehistoric times. Nature Canada 5: 27. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Thornton DH Murray DL (2014) Influence of hybridization on niche shifts in expanding coyote populations. Diversity and Distributions 20: 1355– 1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12253 · DOI
- Van Valkenburgh B Hertel F (1993) Tough times at La Brea: Tooth breakage in large carnivores of the late Pleistocene. Science 261: 456– 459. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.261.5120.456 17770024 · DOI
- vonHoldt BM Kays R Pollinger JP Wayne RK (2016) Admixture mapping identifies introgressed genomic regions in North American canids. Molecular Ecology 25: 2443– 2453. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13667 27106273 · DOI
- vonHoldt BM Pollinger JP Earl DA Knowles JC Boyko AR Parker H Geffen E Pilot M Jedrzejewski W Jedrzejewska B Sidorovich V Greco C Randi E Musiani M Kays R Bustamante CD Ostrander EA Novembre J Wayne RK (2011) A genome-wide perspective on the evolutionary history of enigmatic wolf-like canids. Genome Research 21: 1294– 1305. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.116301.110 21566151 PMC3149496 · DOI
- Weeks JL Tori GM Shieldcastle MC (1990) Coyotes (Canis latrans) in Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 90(5): 142– 145.
- Williams JW Shuman BN Webb III T Bartlein PJ Leduc PL (2004) Late-Quaternary vegetation dynamics in North America: Scaling from taxa to biomes. Ecological Monographs 74: 309– 334. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-4045 · DOI
- Young SP Jackson HHT (1951) The clever coyote. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 411 pp.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs
Williams, T. D., Kreling, S. E. S., Stanton, L. A., Wilkinson, C. E., Estien, C. O., Schell, C. J., & Carlen, E. J. (2024) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-024-00492-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“This may be due to the increased hybridization of coyotes on the East coast with domestic dogs ( Canis familiaris ) and wolves ( Canis lupus ) promoting a variation in pelage coloration (Gipson, 1976; Anderson et al., 2009; Mowry & Edge, 2014; Caudill & Caudill, 2015; Hody & Kays, 2018).”
Mowry, C. B., Wilson, L. A., & vonHoldt, B. M. (2021) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d13080372 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“In Georgia, coyotes first appeared in the central portion of the state in the 1960s and had a state-wide distribution just 20 years later [28,31,33].”
Background
- Authors
- Hody, J. W., & Kays, R.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences (US)
- ORCID
- Kays, Roland
- Venue
- ZooKeys
- Publisher
- Pensoft Publishers
- Published
- 2018-05-22
- Volume
- 759
- Issue
- 759
- Pages
- 81-97
- ISSN
- 1313-2970 (ISSN-L)
- 1313-2989
- PMC
- PMC5974007
- OpenAlex
- W2804311852
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ZooKeys (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- coyote, range expansion, historical range, geographic distribution, Holocene, museum specimens, fossil record, archaeological record, forest fragmentation, predator-prey interactions, North America, Central America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review