The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effectiveness, Safety, and Predictors of Good Clinical Response in 1250 Patients Treated with Adalimumab for Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
Abstract
Objective.: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in a large cohort of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and identified clinical predictors of good clinical response. Methods.: Patients with active AS [Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≥4] received adalimumab 40 mg every other week in addition to their standard antirheumatic therapies in a multinational 12-week, open-label study. We used 3 definitions of good clinical response: 50% improvement in the BASDAI (BASDAI = 50), 40% improvement in the ASsessments of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS40), or ASAS partial remission. Response predictors were determined by logistic regression with backward elimination (selection level 5%). Results.: Of 1250 patients, 1159 (92.7%) completed 12 weeks of adalimumab treatment. At Week 12, 57.2% of patients achieved BASDAI 50, 53.7% achieved ASAS40, and 27.7% achieved ASAS partial remission. Important predictors of good clinical response (BASDAI 50, ASAS40, and partial remission) were younger age (p < 0.001), and greater C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (p ≤ 0.001), HLA-B27 positivity (p ≤ 0.01), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist naivety (p < 0.001). Conclusion.: Adalimumab was effective in this large cohort of patients with AS, with more than half of patients achieving a BASDAI 50 or ASAS40 response and more than a quarter of patients reaching partial remission at Week 12.Younger age, greater CRP concentrations, HLA-B27 positivity, and TNF antagonist naivety were strongly associated with BASDAI 50, ASAS40, and partial remission responses. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00478660.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Australo-Anglo-American Spondyloarthritis Consortium (TASC), Evans, D. M., the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2 (WTCCC2), Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC), Spencer, C. C. A., Pointon, J. J., Su, Z., Harvey, D., Kochan, G., Oppermann, U., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.873 · Cited by 893
Song, I.-H., Hermann, K., Haibel, H., Althoff, C., Listing, J., Burmester, G., Krause, A., Bohl-Bühler, M., Freundlich, B., Rudwaleit, M., et al. (2011) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2010.139667 · Cited by 285
Self-citationArends, S., Brouwer, E., van der Veer, E., Groen, H., Leijsma, M. K., Houtman, P. M., Th A Jansen, T. L., Kallenberg, C. G., & Spoorenberg, A. (2011) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/ar3369 · Cited by 229
Sieper, J., Porter-Brown, B., Thompson, L., Harari, O., & Dougados, M. (2014) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203559 · Cited by 184
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- RUDWALEIT, M., CLAUDEPIERRE, P., WORDSWORTH, P., CORTINA, E. L., SIEPER, J., KRON, M., CARCERERI-DE-PRATI, R., KUPPER, H., & KARY, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Rheumatology
- Publisher
- The Journal of Rheumatology
- Published
- 2009-02-27
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 801-808
- ISSN
- 0315-162X (ISSN-L)
- 1499-2752
- OpenAlex
- W1983371526
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness, Safety, and Predictors of Good Clinical Response in 1250 Patients Treated with Adalimumab for Active Ankylosing Spondylitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3899/jrheum.081048
- The paper
- RUDWALEIT, M., CLAUDEPIERRE, P., WORDSWORTH, P., CORTINA, E. L., SIEPER, J., KRON, M., CARCERERI-DE-PRATI, R., KUPPER, H., & KARY, S. (2009). Effectiveness, Safety, and Predictors of Good Clinical Response in 1250 Patients Treated with Adalimumab for Active Ankylosing Spondylitis. The Journal of Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.081048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.