Cited by 407Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

Open access
BENNETT, ROBERT M., BUSHMAKIN, ANDREW G., CAPPELLERI, JOSEPH C., ZLATEVA, GERGANA, SADOSKY, ALESIA B.·2009·The Journal of Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective.: The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) is a disease-specific composite instrument that measures the effect of problems experienced by patients with fibromyalgia (FM). Utilization of the FIQ in measuring changes due to interventions in FM requires derivation of a clinically meaningful change for that instrument. Analyses were conducted to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and to propose FIQ severity categories. Methods.: Data from 3 similarly designed, 3-month placebo-controlled, clinical treatment trials of pregabalin 300, 450, and 600 mg/day in patients with FM were modeled to estimate the change in the mean FIQ total and stiffness items corresponding to each category on the Patient Global Impression of Change. FIQ severity categories were modeled and determined using established pain severity cutpoints as an anchor. Results.: A total of 2228 patients, mean age 49 years, 93% women, with a mean baseline FIQ total score of 62 were treated in the 3 studies. Estimated MCID on a given measure were similar across the studies. In a pooled analysis the estimated MCID (95% confidence interval) was 14% (13; 15) and for FIQ stiffness it was 13% (12; 14). In the severity analysis a FIQ total score from 0 to < 39 was found to represent a mild effect, ≥ 39 to < 59 a moderate effect, and ≥ 59 to 100 a severe effect. Conclusion.: The analysis indicates that a 14% change in the FIQ total score is clinically relevant, and results of these analyses should enhance the clinical utility of the FIQ in research and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3899/jrheum.081090

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 407

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Arnold LM, Crofford LJ, Mease PJ, et al. Patient perspectives on the impact of fibromyalgia. Patient Educ Couns 2008a;73:114-20. The Journal of Rheumatology 2009; 36:6; doi:10.3899/jrheum.081090 Personal non-commercial use only. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2009. All rights reserved.
  2. Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennett RM. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol 1991;18:728-33.
  3. Bennett R. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ): a review of its development, current version, operating characteristics and uses. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23 Suppl:S154-62.
  4. Dunkl PR, Taylor AG, McConnell GG, Alfano AP, Conaway MR. Responsiveness of fibromyalgia clinical trial outcome measures. J Rheumatol 2000;27:2683-91.
  5. Bennett RM, Kamin M, Karim R, Rosenthal N. Tramadol and acetaminophen combination tablets in the treatment of fibromyalgia pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Med 2003;114:537-45.
  6. Gendreau RM, Thorn MD, Gendreau JF, et al. Efficacy of milnacipran in patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2005;32:1975-85.
  7. Mease P, Arnold LM, Bennett R, et al. Fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1415-25.
  8. Mease PJ, Russell IJ, Arnold LM, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of pregabalin in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2008;35:502-14.
  9. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:82.
  10. Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2001:63-4.
  11. Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, Edwards KR, Cleeland CS. When is cancer pain mild, moderate, or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain 1995;61:277-84.
  12. Agresti A. An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
  13. Cella CF, Hahn EA, Dineen K. Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening. Qual Life Res 2002;11:207-21.
  14. Cappelleri JC, Siegel RL, Osterloh IH, Rosen RC. Relationship between patient self-assessment of erectile function and the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 2000;56:477-81.

Authors
BENNETT, R. M., BUSHMAKIN, A. G., CAPPELLERI, J. C., ZLATEVA, G., & SADOSKY, A. B.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
Venue
The Journal of Rheumatology
Published
2009-04-15
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
1304-1311
ISSN
  • 0315-162X (ISSN-L)
  • 1499-2752
OpenAlex
W2002718846
Cited by
407
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 30
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
fibromyalgia, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, minimal clinically important difference, pregabalin, stiffness, patient-reported outcomes, treatment response assessment, Patient Global Impression of Change
MeSH terms
Pregabalin, Analgesics, Disability Evaluation, Female, Fibromyalgia, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review