The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Principal Components as a Measure of Systemic Risk
Abstract
The U. S. government’s failure to provide adequate oversight and prudent regulation of the financial markets, together with excessive risk taking by some financial institutions, pushed the world financial system to the brink of systemic failure in 2008. As a consequence of this near catastrophe, both regulators and investors have become keenly interested in developing tools for monitoring systemic risk. But this is easier said than done. Securitization, private transacting, complexity, and “flexible accounting” prevent us from directly observing the many explicit linkages of financial institutions. As an alternative, the authors introduce a measure of implied systemic risk, the absorption ratio, which equals the fraction of the total variance of a set of asset returns explained or “absorbed” by a fixed number of eigenvectors. The absorption ratio captures the extent to which markets are unified or tightly coupled. When markets are tightly coupled, they are more fragile in the sense that negative shocks propagate more quickly and broadly than when markets are loosely linked. TOPICS:Analysis of individual factors/risk premia, volatility measures, statistical methods
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Survey of Systemic Risk Analytics
Bisias, D., Flood, M., Lo, A. W., & Valavanis, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Financial Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-financial-110311-101754 · Cited by 659
Systemic risk and the macroeconomy: An empirical evaluation
Giglio, S., Kelly, B., & Pruitt, S. (2016) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.010 · Cited by 555
Systemic risk: The impact of COVID-19
Rizwan, M. S., Ahmad, G., & Ashraf, D. (2020) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2020.101682 · Cited by 282
Poverty Alleviation Strategies in Eastern China Lead to Critical Ecological Dynamics
Zhang, K., Dearing, J. A., Dawson, T. P., Dong, X., Yang, X., & Zhang, W. (2015) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.096 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Kritzman, M., Li, Y., Page, S., & Rigobon, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Portfolio Management
- Publisher
- With Intelligence LLC
- Published
- 2011-07-31
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 112-126
- ISSN
- 0095-4918 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-8656
- OpenAlex
- W3124088450
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principal Components as a Measure of Systemic Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3905/jpm.2011.37.4.112
- The paper
- Kritzman, M., Li, Y., Page, S., & Rigobon, R. (2011). Principal Components as a Measure of Systemic Risk. The Journal of Portfolio Management. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2011.37.4.112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.