The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The protective effect of boric acid on aluminum-induced hepatotoxicity and genotoxicity in rats
Open accessAbstract
The efficacy of boric acid (BA) was examined on liver marker enzymes in aluminum (Al)-treated rats. Also, a liver micronucleus assay was performed to evaluate the genotoxicity in hepatocytes. With these aims, Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly separated into 10 groups of 5 animals. Aluminum chloride (5 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) AlCl3) and BA (3.25, 13, 36 and 58.5 mg/kg b.w.) alone were administered with injections to the experimental animals. Furthermore, the animals were also treated with Al for 4 consecutive days followed by BA exposure for 10 days. The rats were anesthetized after Al and BA injections and the levels of serum enzymes were determined. Hepatocytes were isolated for counting the number of micronucleated hepatocytes (MNHEPs). After exposure to Al, the enzymatic activities of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) significantly increased. Furthermore, this metal caused a significant increase in MNHEPs' incidence. In contrast, the applications of BA doses did not cause any adverse effect on the above parameters. Moreover, pretreatments with BA significantly modulated the toxic effects of Al.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hepatic and pancreatic lesions cause changes in metabolism which result in hyperglycaemia, hypoproteinaemia, hyperlipidaemia, hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia.
“The hepatic and pancreatic lesions cause changes in metabolism (Figure 5) which result in hyperglycaemia, hypoproteinaemia, hyperlipidaemia, hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia (Omar et al., 2003; Kowalczyk et al., 2004; Türkez et al., 2011; Abdel-Wahab, 2012; Belaïd-Nouira et al., 2013).”
From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Türkez et al., 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects
Igbokwe, I. O., Igwenagu, E., & Igbokwe, N. A. (2019) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.2478/intox-2019-0007 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- TÜRKEZ, H., GEYİKOĞLU, F., & ÇOLAK, S.
- Affiliations
- Atatürk University (TR)
- Venue
- Turkish Journal of Biology
- Published
- 2011-01-01
- ISSN
- 1300-0152 (ISSN-L)
- 1303-6092
- OpenAlex
- W2152048797
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
- DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Atatürk Üniversitesi
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Keywords
- boric acid, aluminum toxicity, hepatotoxicity, genotoxicity, micronuclei, liver enzymes, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, hepatoprotection, aluminum chloride, hepatocytes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review