DEFECT CLASSIFICATION OF RAILWAY FASTENERS USING IMAGE PREPROCESSING AND A LIGHTWEIGHT CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK
Open accessAbstract
Railway fasteners are used to securely fix rails to sleeper blocks.Partial wear or complete loss of these components can lead to serious accidents and cause train derailments.To ensure the safety of railway transportation, computer vision and pattern recognition-based methods are increasingly used to inspect railway infrastructure.In particular, it has become an important task to detect defects in railway tracks.This is challenging since rail track images are acquired using a measuring train in varying environmental conditions, at different times of day and in poor lighting conditions, and the resulting images often have low contrast.In this study, a new method is proposed for the classification of defects on rail track fasteners.The proposed approach uses image enhancement to first filter the rail images and obtain a high contrast image.Then, the rail track and sleeper positions are determined from the high contrast image.The location of the fastener is determined by applying the line local binary pattern method and the defects of the fastener are classified using an improved lightweight convolutional neural network (LCNN) model.Features are extracted from two fully connected layers of the developed LCNN model and the feature vector is constructed by concatenating these layers.The concatenated features are processed using a number of machine learning methods and the optimum classifier is chosen.Experimental results show that Cubic SVM gives the best results with a detection accuracy rate of 99.7%.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wei, X., Yang, Z., Liu, Y., Wei, D., Jia, L., & Li, Y. (2019) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.01.008 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Aydın, İ., Sevi, M., Salur, M. U., & Akın, E.
- Corresponding author
- İlhan Aydın
- Venue
- TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 1300-0632 (ISSN-L)
- 1303-6203
- OpenAlex
- W4244570841
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DSpace - FIRAT (Fırat University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Railway Engineering and Dynamics
- Keywords
- defect classification, lightweight convolutional neural network, image enhancement, railway track inspection, railway infrastructure inspection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review