Assessing and Addressing Health Literacy
Abstract
The ability to communicate effectively with patients who have low health literacy depends on our ability to recognize this problem and to create a patient-centered and shame-free healthcare environment. Because of the shame and embarrassment these patients experience, they often use their well-developed coping skills to mask their limited literacy. Although a number of reading- and comprehension-assessment tools are available, there is debate whether or not these tools should be used clinically. This article provides guidance in regard to establishing an environment that promotes health literacy, assessing health literacy levels, utilizing strategies to increase health literacy, evaluating the learning that has occurred, and incorporating health literacy concepts into the nursing curriculum.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with low health literacy are often more reluctant to seek medical care as they feel embarrassed by their inadequate health knowledge and avoid seeking assistance from others.
“such patients are often more reluctant to seek medical care as they feel embarrassed by their inadequate health knowledge and avoid seeking assistance from others [60].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [60]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 116
- Authors
- Cornett, S.
- Corresponding author
- Cornett, Sandy
- Venue
- OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
- Publisher
- American Nurses Association
- Published
- 2009-09-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1091-3734 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111138773
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- OJIN The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing (publishedVersion)
- The online journal of issues in nursing
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Keywords
- health literacy, low health literacy, patient-centered care, shame and embarrassment, coping strategies, reading assessment, comprehension assessment, health literacy promotion, nursing education, nursing curriculum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review