Cited by 15Middle East Politics and SocietyPolitical Conflict and GovernanceIslamic Studies and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clientélisme, communautarisme et fragmentation territoriale en Syrie

Open access
Balanche, Fabrice·2009·A contrario

Abstract

Résumé La fragmentation du territoire syrien sur des bases communautaires est directement liée au fonctionnement du régime baathiste contrôlé par un clan issu d’une minorité religieuse : les alaouites. L’appartenance à une minorité considérée comme hérétique par les musulmans sunnites, qui constituent 80 % de la population syrienne, prive la famille Assad d’une réelle légitimité qui l’oblige à utiliser les ressorts du clientélisme politique pour se maintenir au pouvoir. Tout en condamnant le confessionnalisme qui plonge les pays voisins dans la tourmente, le clan des Assad, fonde sa stratégie sur trois points : unifier et asservir la communauté alaouite dans laquelle sont recrutés l’essentiel des forces de sécurité et les cadres du régime, associer les autres minorités (chrétiens, ismaéliens et druzes) contre les sunnites, et enfin diviser la majorité sunnite pour marginaliser sa force politique potentielle. Dans la région côtière (provinces de Lattaquié et Tartous) ces principes sont exacerbés car il s’agit du fief de la communauté alaouite. L’unité et l’extension territoriale de la communauté alaouite se produit contre les musulmans sunnites, dont les territoires sont marginalisés, tandis que les territoires chrétiens et les ismaéliens sont mieux intégrés dans ce qui est conçu comme un territoire refuge en cas de perte du pouvoir à Damas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3917/aco.061.0122

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Balanche, F.
Corresponding author
Balanche, Fabrice
Venue
A contrario
Publisher
CAIRN
Published
2009-06-22
Volume
n° 11
Issue
1
Pages
122-150
ISSN
1660-7880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1488808676
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • A contrario (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
Keywords
clientelism, communitarianism, territorial fragmentation, Alawites, Sunnis, sectarianism, political legitimacy, minority groups, Druze, Ismailis, Christians, Latakia, Tartu

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clientélisme, communautarisme et fragmentation territoriale en Syrie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3917/aco.061.0122
The paper
Balanche, F. (2009). Clientélisme, communautarisme et fragmentation territoriale en Syrie. A contrario. https://doi.org/10.3917/aco.061.0122