Cited by 24Natural Language Processing TechniquesComputational and Text Analysis MethodsText and Document Classification Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Recherche improbable d'une homogène diversité : le débat sur l'identité nationale

Open access

Abstract

Dans cet article, nous comparons les effets de deux méthodes de correction morphologique d’un corpus issu du web sur des classifications de type ALCESTE avec le logiciel IRAMUTEQ . À partir des 18 240 contributions au débat sur l’identité nationale, nous comparons le corpus initial avec un corpus corrigé manuellement et un corpus corrigé par une méthode semi-automatique reposant sur une utilisation particulière du correcteur Hunspell . Les trois corpus obtenus (initial, automatique et manuel) sont soumis à deux classifications hiérarchiques descendantes : l’une conserve les 1 500 formes pleines les plus fréquentes, l’autre les 3 000 formes pleines les plus fréquentes. La comparaison deux à deux des résultats obtenus sur chacun des corpus montre que la correction automatique que nous proposons permet de se rapprocher significativement d’une correction manuelle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3917/lang.187.0093

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 24

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. MARCHAND P. (2010), “Attitudes towards language : new perspectives”, International Review of Social Psychology 23, 125-153.

Metadata

Authors
Ratinaud, P., & Marchand, P.
Affiliations
  • Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
Venue
Langages
Publisher
CAIRN.INFO
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
n° 187
Issue
3
Pages
93-107
ISSN
0458-726X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977909923
Cited by
24
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Langages (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
Keywords
French orthography, IRAMUTEQ, Alceste, web corpus, national identity debate, lexical diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recherche improbable d'une homogène diversité : le débat sur l'identité nationale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3917/lang.187.0093
The paper
Ratinaud, P., & Marchand, P. (2012). Recherche improbable d'une homogène diversité : le débat sur l'identité nationale. Langages. https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.187.0093