The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Le Conseil d'État en politique
Open accessAbstract
Résumé À travers son histoire, le Conseil d’État a toujours exercé une influence politique, contribuant à la diffusion de certaines valeurs ou arbitrant des conflits politiques qui avaient un prolongement contentieux. Dans les années 1980, dans le contexte de l’alternance, on a dénoncé, parfois avec vigueur, la politisation du Conseil d’État. Aujourd’hui, les accusations se sont taries et les décisions du Conseil d’État sont moins souvent perçues comme politiques. On peut toutefois faire l’hypothèse que les choix politiques du Conseil d’État n’ont pas disparu, mais qu’ils sont moins visibles dès lors qu’ils ne tranchent pas sur le consensus dominant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The most notable of these systems of pre-approval is the Conseil d ' Êtat in France, and its equivalent in other Napoleonic systems (see Lochak, 2007).”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Lochak, 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding
Yesilkagit, K., Bauer, M., Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2024) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13808 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Lochak, D.
- Affiliations
- Université Paris Nanterre (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lochak, Danièle
- Venue
- Pouvoirs
- Publisher
- CAIRN.INFO
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- n° 123
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 19-32
- ISSN
- 0152-0768 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171226946
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Pouvoirs (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Administrative Law and Governance
- Social Sciences › Law › Law and Political Science
- Keywords
- Conseil d'État, political alternance, 1980s, French administrative law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
