Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 85Religion and Society InteractionsStudy and Philosophy of ReligionReligious Freedom and Discrimination

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sociologie des religions

Open access
Willaime, Jean-Paul·2004·Que sais-je ?

Abstract

Au cours du premier semestre 2020, un nouveau cycle de conférences à la Bibliothèque nationale de France est consacré à la sociologie des religions en France. Les chercheurs invités interviennent sur des questions d’actualité, depuis l’appartenance religieuse jusqu’à l’écologie en passant par les itinéraires de conversion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3917/puf.willa.2004.01

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Willaime, J.-P.
Affiliations
Groupe Sociétés, Religions, Laïcités (FR)
Corresponding author
Willaime, Jean-Paul
Venue
Que sais-je ?
Published
2004-07-01
ISSN
0768-0066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1539921870
Cited by
85
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.38
Type
book
Language
fr
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Que sais-je ? (publishedVersion)
  • OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
Keywords
sociology of religion, religious affiliation, religious ecology, conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sociologie des religions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3917/puf.willa.2004.01
The paper
Willaime, J.-P. (2004). Sociologie des religions. Que sais-je ? https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.willa.2004.01

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.