Cited by 17Animal Law and WelfareRousseau and Enlightenment ThoughtEuropean Political History Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

La promotion de l’animal sensible. Une révolution dans la Révolution

Open access
Baratay, Éric·2012·Revue historique

Abstract

Résumé Les débats contemporains sur la sensibilité de l’animal, le respect et la protection de celui-ci, l’extension du droit à son profit et son utilisation éthique sont pour la première fois, non pas évoqués, mais publiquement et politiquement débattus au moment de la Révolution française. Sous l’influence du rousseauisme, prônant la prééminence de la sensibilité sur la raison, et dans le contexte révolutionnaire de bouleversement des idées, des situations et des conditions, cette question des animaux est maintes fois posée dans des rapports, des mémoires et lors de discours officiels. Les thèses avancées et débattues sont étonnement modernes et encore d’actualité. Leur caractère révolutionnaire peut peut-être s’expliquer par la volonté débridée de repenser toutes les conditions, à commencer par les sujets et les esclaves, car penser l’autre c’est un jour penser l’animal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3917/rhis.121.0131

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baratay, É.
Affiliations
Université Jean Moulin Lyon III (FR)
Corresponding author
Baratay, Éric
Venue
Revue historique
Publisher
CAIRN
Published
2012-04-17
Volume
n° 661
Issue
1
Pages
131-153
ISSN
0035-3264 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972445491
Cited by
17
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Revue historique (publishedVersion)
  • Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › European Political History Analysis
Keywords
animal sensitivity, animal protection, animal rights, French Revolution, Rousseauism, ethics of animal use, animal ethics, otherness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review