Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG suspected infection in a newborn with intrauterine growth restriction
Abstract
A disseminated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103 infection was suspected in a 6 day-old newborn with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) symptoms, treated empirically with antibiotics and given L. rhamnosus GG with the aim of preventing antibiotic-associated gastrointestinal complications. The level of C-reactive protein on day 5 compared with day 2 was increased in spite of negative urine and cerebrospinal fluid cultures. The blood sampled on day 6 was found to be positive for lactobacilli, and the isolate was pre-identified as L. rhamnosus or Lactobacillus casei on day 11. The strain identity was then verified as L. rhamnosus GG through PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing. Genotyping with the rep-PCR and AFLP methods confirmed the 100% genetic similarity for both the strain isolated from patient blood and the probiotic product. The newborn became touch-sensitive, cried a lot, had worsening laboratory test results, and increased inflammation parameters, but no fever was observed. After a further 9 days of antibiotic therapy, blood cultures became negative, and laboratory tests improved on day 25. The patient was discharged from the hospital after 27 days. IUGR with a possible link to L. rhamnosus GG bacteraemia might be a new potential risk group, beside patients with organ failure, immunocompromised status and dysfunctional gut barrier mechanisms, for which safe use of probiotics needs careful attention. Universally accepted or improved guidelines for the safer administration of probiotics in risk groups are urgently needed. This report should not discourage the use of probiotics, but should highlight the need for their careful use in IUGR patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our review of the literature (from 1980 to 2023) found 23 cases where the blood isolate from a bacteremic patient was identical to the probiotic strain the patient had been taking.
“Our review of the literature (from 1980 to 2023) found 23 cases where the blood isolate from a bacteremic patient was identical to the probiotic strain the patient had been taking.”
From Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [59]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Sadowska-Krawczenko, I., Paprzycka, M., Korbal, P., Wiatrzyk, A., Krysztopa-Grzybowska, K., Polak, M., Czajka, U., & Lutyńska, A.
- Affiliations
- Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL)
- Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2 in Bydgoszcz (PL)
- Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy (PL)
- Venue
- Beneficial Microbes
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2014-12-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 397-402
- ISSN
- 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
- 1876-2891
- OpenAlex
- W2029729144
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, fetal growth restriction, neonates, probiotic safety, C-reactive protein, strain identification, REP-PCR, AFLP
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Blood, C-Reactive Protein, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Probiotics, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis, Molecular Typing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review