Probiotic and prebiotic interventions for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
Many studies have associated altered intestinal bacterial communities and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, but the putative effects are inconclusive. The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through randomised intervention trials. Literature searches were performed until March 2020. For each outcome, a random NMA was performed, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was determined. A total of 22 randomised trials comparing prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic treatments included 1301 participants. Considering all seven results (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, body mass index, weight, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) together, the highest SUCRA values are probiotics (94%), synbiotics (61%) and prebiotics (56%), respectively. NMA results provide evidence that probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics can alleviate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. However, due to the lack of high-quality randomised trials, this research also has some limitations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Probiotics can alleviate NAFLD.
“There is also evidence that probiotics can alleviate NAFLD [126]”
From The Potential Impact of Probiotics on Human Health: An Update on Their Health-Promoting Properties (2024) · cites this paper as [126]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Jin, H., Xu, X., Pang, B., Yang, R., Sun, H., Jiang, C., Shao, D., & Shi, J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
- Venue
- Beneficial Microbes
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2021-11-16
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 517-530
- ISSN
- 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
- 1876-2891
- OpenAlex
- W3199294256
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, gut microbiota, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, body mass index, cholesterol, lipid profile, weight loss
- MeSH terms
- Network Meta-Analysis, Humans, Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review