Cited by 58Insect Utilization and EffectsAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies

Bioconversion of sorghum and cowpea by black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens (L.)) larvae for alternative protein production

Tinder, A.C., Puckett, R.T., Turner, N.D., Cammack, J.A., Tomberlin, J.K.·2017·Journal of Insects as Food and Feed

Abstract

The larvae and prepupae of the black soldier fly,Hermetia illucens (L.) (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) have been explored as a means for alternate protein production for feed for animals that are raised for human food. However, processes for production of these and other insects must be refined if cultivation is to become widespread and efficient. In this study, black soldier fly larvae were fed one of six diets, consisting of the Gainesville house fly diet (control), and five diets of varying ratios of sorghum and cowpea. Effects on life-history traits and nutritional content of prepupae were observed. Flies were able to successfully complete larval development on all diets tested. There were significant differences in development rates based on diet, particularly the diets containing a higher percentage of sorghum. In general, larvae reared on the sorghum diets (which were lower in protein than that of the cowpea diets), developed slower (3-9 days longer from larval eclosion to the prepupal stage) than those on the cowpea diets. Diet treatment did not consistently influence weight or length of prepupae. Higher protein diets (7.73% protein) translated to higher protein content of prepupae (43.70-47.29% protein) and lower protein diets (3.51% protein) resulted in greater gross energy content of prepupae (5.22-6.21 Kcal/g). These differences suggest that macro-nutrient content of prepupae can be influenced by larval diet. This study provides further evidence of the viability of black soldier flies for protein production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3920/jiff2016.0048

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein is an essential nutrient in larval feeding substrates because of its significant positive effect on larval development.

    “Protein is an essential nutrient in larval feeding substrates because of its significant positive effect on larval development [62].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tinder, A. C., Puckett, R. T., Turner, N. D., Cammack, J. A., & Tomberlin, J. K.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
Journal of Insects as Food and Feed
Published
2017-06-16
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
121-130
ISSN
2352-4588 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2563118912
Cited by
58
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Insects as Food and Feed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Keywords
Hermetia illucens, insect protein production, alternative protein sources, sorghum, cowpea, larval nutrition, prepupae, larval development rate, nutritional content, insect feed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review