Cited by 27Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Self-face perception: individual differences and discrepancies associated with mental self-face representation, attractiveness and self-esteem

Open access
Felisberti, Fatima M., Musholt, Kristina·2014·Psychology & Neuroscience

Abstract

Self-face perception plays an important role in self-consciousness and personal identity as well as in social exchanges and well-being. Despite its significance, little is known about how individuals represent their faces internally. This study explored mechanisms of self-face perception in three experiments. First, participants chose from two images (self-face image vs. self-image with manipulated facial features) which one was their veridical image and which one they liked most. Afterwards, participants could (digitally) manipulate their facial features to increase their attractiveness (either to themselves or to an imagined other/s). Results showed that self-face recognition was better when veridical faces were paired with 'clones' with larger facial features or when all facial features were enlarged concurrently. Moreover, up to half of the participants preferred smaller noses and larger eyes and manipulated their self-images accordingly. State (but not trait) self-esteem was inversely correlated with eye, mouth and nose size manipulations made to increase one's attractiveness. The results indicate that a certain tolerance for error in self-face recognition might be required to maintain a consistent facial identity during one's lifespan. The discovered preference for neotenous features and discrepancies between one's perceived and one's veridical face and their link to state self-esteem are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3922/j.psns.2014.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frequent use of beauty filters has already been found to lead to anxiety and depression, reduced self-esteem, body dysmorphia, an increase of plastic surgery, feelings of inadequacy and increased pressure to conform to unrealistic beauty standards.

    “Frequent use of beauty filters has already been found to lead to anxiety and depression, reduced self-esteem, body dysmorphia, an increase of plastic surgery, feelings of inadequacy and increased pressure to conform to unrealistic beauty standards [47,50,52,96,99–102].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 27

Authors
Felisberti, F. M., & Musholt, K.
Affiliations
  • Kingston University London (GB)
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Venue
Psychology & Neuroscience
Published
2014-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
65-72
ISSN
  • 1983-3288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1984-3054
OpenAlex
W2136527413
Cited by
27
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology & Neuroscience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
self-face perception, self-face recognition, facial attractiveness, self-esteem, neoteny, face identity, individual differences, state self-esteem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review