Cited by 60Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFungal Plant Pathogen ControlNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Calcium and Chitosan Treatments on Controlling Anthracnose and Postharvest Quality of Papaya (Carica papaya L.)

Open access
Eryani-Raq, A.Al, Mahmud, T.M.M., Syed Omar, S.R., Mohamed Za, A.R., Al Eryani, A.R.·2009·International Journal of Agricultural Research

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro fungicidal effects of calcium and chitosan on Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and to as well determine their effects on storage life and quality of papaya. Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) incorporated with calcium at different concentrations (1.5, 2.5 or 3.5%) or in combination with chitosan at 0.75% or chitosan alone were used as treatments for in vitro tests. Uncorporated treatments with PDA and untreated fruits as control used on papaya fruits for storage life and quality evolutions. Chitosan had the greatest effect against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in both in vitro and in disease incidence (%) on papaya fruits compared to calcium treatment and as well as control. Calcium reduced spores germination significantly as calcium concentrations increased from 2.5 to 3.5%, compared to the 1.5% and control treatments. However, it did not show any fungicidal effects on mycelial growth. The combination of 2.5% calcium with chitosan 0.75% completely inhibited spore germinations and significantly inhibited mycelia growth compared to calcium individual treatments and as well as control. Anthracnose disease incidence (%) was significantly controlled (5.6%) using calcium at 2.5% combined with chitosan compared with the other treatments. This demonstrated the best effect on controlling anthracnose disease incidence for papaya fruits. Moreover, this treatment proved able to extend the storage life of papaya fruits up to 33 days of storage life while maintaining valuable attributes of quality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3923/ijar.2009.53.68

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dubost, 1984, Cystic teratoma of the diaphragm. A case report and literature review., J. Chir. (Paris), 121, 273

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Eryani-Raq, A. A., Mahmud, T. M. M., Syed Omar, S. R., Mohamed Za, A. R., & Al Eryani, A. R.
Venue
International Journal of Agricultural Research
Publisher
Science Alert
Published
2009-01-15
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
53-68
ISSN
1816-4897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025731590
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Agricultural Research (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Keywords
papaya, Carica papaya, anthracnose, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, calcium, chitosan, postharvest quality, storage life, fungicidal activity, spore germination, mycelial growth inhibition, disease control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review