The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three stage maturity model in SME’s toward industry 4.0
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To address the challenges regarding the concept of Industry 4.0 and the diversification methodology and based on the strategic guidance towards Industry 4.0, we propose a process model as a guiding framework for Industry 4.0 collaborative diversification vision, strategy and action building. In this paper we suggest a stage process model to guide and train companies to identify new opportunities for diversification within Industry 4.0. Systematically carrying out the stages will take a company to their individual specific vision and collaborative vision between different companies in the Industry 4.0 scenario.Design/methodology/approach: This new collaborative diversification methodology involves industry within the pilot program; from the diversification and capacity assessment analysis of the company`s profile, skills and technologies that dominates, to identify the diversification opportunity map and its business modeling within the Industry 4.0 paradigm.Findings: The application of maturity models to the Industry 4.0 may help organizations to integrate this methodology into their culture. Results show a real need for guided support in developing a company-specific Industry 4.0 vision and specific project planning.Originality/value: Industry 4.0 promotes a vision where recent developments in information technology are expected to enable entirely new forms of cooperative engineering and manufacturing. The vision of industry 4.0 describes a whole new approach to business operations, and especially the production industries. To address the challenges regarding the concept of Industry 4.0 and the diversification methodology discussed above, and based on the strategic guidance towards Industry 4.0, we propose a unique process model as a guiding framework for Industry 4.0 collaborative diversification vision, strategy and action building.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 · Cited by 4,276
Cited by
Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.005 · Cited by 1,121
Maturity and Readiness Model for Industry 4.0 Strategy
Akdil, K. Y., Ustundag, A., & Cevikcan, E. (2018) · Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5_4 · Cited by 284
The degree of readiness for the implementation of Industry 4.0
Pacchini, A. P. T., Lucato, W. C., Facchini, F., & Mummolo, G. (2019) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.103125 · Cited by 268
Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers
Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V. (2021) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2021.103522 · Cited by 200
Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2022) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc8020067 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganzarain, J., & Errasti, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management
- Publisher
- Omnia Publisher SL
- Published
- 2016-12-20
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1119
- ISSN
- 2013-0953 (ISSN-L)
- 2013-8423
- OpenAlex
- W2567619388
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three stage maturity model in SME’s toward industry 4.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3926/jiem.2073
- The paper
- Ganzarain, J., & Errasti, N. (2016). Three stage maturity model in SME’s toward industry 4.0. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.