Cited by 68Innovations in Medical EducationHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing education and management

Deterrents to Nurses’ Participation in Continuing Professional Development: An Integrative Literature Review

Schweitzer, Donna J., Krassa, Teresa J.·2010·The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing

Abstract

Background Continuing education (CE) helps nurses keep their practice safe and current. Although the literature provides information about motivating strategies, learning styles and settings, and reinforcement of the need to update skills, little research has focused on barriers to nurses' CE program attendance. This literature review describes factors that deter nurses' CE attendance. Methods Ten research studies published between 1990 and 2008 addressing barriers to nurses' CE participation were located. Results The most frequent deterrents found were the cost of attending CE, inability to get time off from work to attend CE, and child care and home responsibilities. Conclusion Leaders supporting CE must understand factors that motivate and prevent nurses from participating in CE. Implications from this study can assist educators to develop CE offerings to better meet staff needs and increase participation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/00220124-20100601-05

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research identified personal and contextual barriers to attending professional development activities, including inability to leave the unit due to patient care responsibilities, cost of conferences, difficulty getting time off, lack of managerial support, and child care or home responsibilities.

    “Previous research has identified a number of personal and contextual barriers to attending professional development activities including the inability to leave their unit(s) due to patient care responsibilities (Dealy & Bass 1995), the cost of conferences (Dealy & Bass 1995, Harper 2000, Schweitzer & Krassa 2010), difficulty getting time off from work to attend (Schweitzer & Krassa 2010), lack of”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schweitzer, D. J., & Krassa, T. J.
Venue
The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2010-10
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
441-447
ISSN
0022-0124 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032917359
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
continuing professional development, barriers to participation, nurses, work-family responsibilities, child care, nursing education
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Costs and Cost Analysis, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Humans, Motivation, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review